Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hopeful Monsters: A Note on Multiple Conclusions.Bogdan Dicher - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (1):77-98.
    Arguments, the story goes, have one or more premises and only one conclusion. A contentious generalisation allows arguments with several disjunctively connected conclusions. Contentious as this generalisation may be, I will argue nevertheless that it is justified. My main claim is that multiple conclusions are epiphenomena of the logical connectives: some connectives determine, in a certain sense, multiple-conclusion derivations. Therefore, such derivations are completely natural and can safely be used in proof-theoretic semantics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • General Proof Theory: Introduction.Thomas Piecha & Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (1):1-5.
    This special issue on general proof theory collects papers resulting from the conference on general proof theory held in November 2015 in Tübingen.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Proof-theoretic pluralism.Filippo Ferrari & Eugenio Orlandelli - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4879-4903.
    Starting from a proof-theoretic perspective, where meaning is determined by the inference rules governing logical operators, in this paper we primarily aim at developing a proof-theoretic alternative to the model-theoretic meaning-invariant logical pluralism discussed in Beall and Restall. We will also outline how this framework can be easily extended to include a form of meaning-variant logical pluralism. In this respect, the framework developed in this paper—which we label two-level proof-theoretic pluralism—is much broader in scope than the one discussed in Beall (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations