Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Who's/whose at risk? answerability and the critical possibilities of classroom discourse.Jennifer A. Vadeboncoeur & Allan Luke ‡ - 2004 - Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2):201-223.
    Our aim in this article is twofold. First, we challenge the essentialized notion of adolescents and young people as perpetually driven to resist the authority of adults. At the same time, we disrupt linguistic conceptions of adolescent discourse, along with the discourse of youth at risk, by analyzing a transcript of classroom discourse that reflects an exchange between a highly regarded and well liked preservice teacher and his students. This representative transcript highlights the preservice teacher's ability to query, without a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Toys as discourse: children's war toys and the war on terror.David Machin & Theo Van Leeuwen - 2009 - Critical Discourse Studies 6 (1):51-63.
    War toys of different eras realize the dominant discourses of war of the time, and they do so in a way which allows children to enact these discourses and values in play. This paper examines war toys over the past 100 years before providing a detailed multimodal analysis of contemporary war toys distributed around the planet, mainly by global American corporations, which teach children about the importance of the quick decisive strike, the role of the team and the morality of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phil Graham and axiological discourse analysis: after neoliberalism.Allan Luke - forthcoming - Critical Discourse Studies.
    This is an essay introduction to a special edition of Critical Discourse Studies on the work of Phil Graham. It is a critical overview and reappraisal of his major interdisciplinary contribution to the field: an axiological approach that focuses on meaning and values in a materialist political economy of language. The contributors to this volume enlist Graham's approach to trace the aftermaths and discontents of neoliberalism: nothing less than resurgent nationalisms, monoculturalism and autocracy, fuelled by social media and digital communications. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Responding to terror: recruiting a martial body of literate subjects.Stephen Kelly - 2017 - Critical Discourse Studies 14 (2):188-205.
    ABSTRACTIn this paper I conduct a Foucauldian discourse analysis of a political speech given by Brendon Nelson in 2006 when the Australian Minister for Defence in the Howard Coalition Government. The speech connects conceptualizations of terror, globalization, education and literacy as part of a whole of government security strategy. The analysis examines this speech as an example of a liberal way of governing the conduct of diverse and unpredictable populations. My analysis suggests that the apparatus of government has been strategically (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phil Graham: critical insights into the futurity of discourse and the discourse of futurity.Patricia Dunmire - forthcoming - Critical Discourse Studies.
    This essay examines Professor Phil Graham's contributions to the critical study of “futurology,” that is, the creation and use of projections of the future by elite social actors and institutions. Professor Graham was one of the first to examine the linguistic constitution and ideological implications of futurological projections within neoliberal discourses. I review this work and situate it within the broader field of Critical Futures Studies (CFS), a line of inquiry which seeks to interrogate and challenge dominant projections of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark