Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: A two-component re-conceptualization.Aanand D. Naik, Carmel B. Dyer, Mark E. Kunik & Laurence B. McCullough - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):23 – 30.
    The clinical application of the concept of patient autonomy has centered on the ability to deliberate and make treatment decisions (decisional autonomy) to the virtual exclusion of the capacity to execute the treatment plan (executive autonomy). However, the one-component concept of autonomy is problematic in the context of multiple chronic conditions. Adherence to complex treatments commonly breaks down when patients have functional, educational, and cognitive barriers that impair their capacity to plan, sequence, and carry out tasks associated with chronic care. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Introduction.Cristina Richie - 2022 - Global Bioethics 33 (1):1-3.
    Every day from the moment we wake up until the moment we sleep, we have the option to look outward or look inward. This is more than an outlook; it is also a metaphor. As we – citizens, ethicists,...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication.Irene Cambra-Badii, Elena Guardiola & Josep-E. Baños - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2791-2808.
    Two hundred years after it was first published, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus remains relevant. This novel has endured because of its literary merits and because its themes lend themselves to analysis from multiple viewpoints. Scholars from many disciplines have examined this work in relation to controversial scientific research. In this paper, we review the academic literature where Frankenstein is used to discuss ethics, bioethics, science, technology and medicine. We searched the academic literature and carried out a content (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Applied humanities as the antidote for the malaise of bioethics.Monica Consolandi & Renzo Pegoraro - 2025 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 28 (1):121-124.
    The present paper highlights the urgency for a revitalization of the field of bioethics. The authors have identified the “malaise” present in contemporary bioethics, and they claim that it has become a boring way to approach medicine and life sciences instead of challenging them. Starting from a brief explanation of the origin of bioethics, this paper analyzes the main issues at the core of its malaise, i.e., its depersonalization and extreme specialization which exclude of a holistic view of the patient. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Teaching bioethics as a new paradigm for health professionals.Juan Carlos Tealdi - 1993 - Bioethics 7 (2-3):188-199.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to commentaries on “patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: A two-component re-conceptualization”.Aanand D. Naik, Carmel B. Dyer, Mark E. Kunik & Laurence B. McCullough - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W3 – W5.
    The clinical application of the concept of patient autonomy has centered on the ability to deliberate and make treatment decisions to the virtual exclusion of the capacity to execute the treatment plan. However, the one-component concept of autonomy is problematic in the context of multiple chronic conditions. Adherence to complex treatments commonly breaks down when patients have functional, educational, and cognitive barriers that impair their capacity to plan, sequence, and carry out tasks associated with chronic care. The purpose of this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation