Switch to: References

Citations of:

Evolutionary and developmental aspects of intersubjectivity

In Hans Liljenström & Peter Århem (eds.), Consciousness transitions: phylogenetic, ontogenetic, and physiological aspects. Boston: Elsevier (2008)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The role of intersubjectivity in animal and human cooperation.Peter Gärdenfors - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (1):51-62.
    I argue that analyses of various kinds of cooperation will benefit from an account of the cognitive and communicative functions required for the cooperation. In particular, I focus on the role of intersubjectivity , which has not been sufficiently considered in game theory. Intersubjectivity will here be divided into representing the emotions, desires, attention, intentions, and beliefs of others. I then analyze some kinds of cooperation—reciprocal altruism, indirect reciprocity, cooperation on future goals, and conventions—with respect to their cognitive and communicative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Causal Cognition and Theory of Mind in Evolutionary Cognitive Archaeology.Marlize Lombard & Peter Gärdenfors - 2021 - Biological Theory 18 (4):1-19.
    It is widely thought that causal cognition underpins technical reasoning. Here we suggest that understanding causal cognition as a thinking system that includes theory of mind (i.e., social cognition) can be a productive theoretical tool for the field of evolutionary cognitive archaeology. With this contribution, we expand on an earlier model that distinguishes seven grades of causal cognition, explicitly presenting it together with a new analysis of the theory of mind involved in the different grades. We then suggest how such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Technology led to more abstract causal reasoning.Peter Gärdenfors & Marlize Lombard - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (4):1-23.
    Many animal species use tools, but human technical engagement is more complex. We argue that there is coevolution between technical engagement and advanced forms of causal cognition in the human lineage. As an analytic tool, we present a classification of different forms of causal thinking. Human causal thinking has become detached from space and time, so that instead of just reacting to perceptual input, our minds can simulate actions and forces and their causal consequences. Our main thesis is that, unlike (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Reasoning with Expectations About Causal Relations.Peter Gärdenfors - 2022 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):201-217.
    Reasoning is not just following logical rules, but a large part of human reasoning depends on our expectations about the world. To some extent, non-monotonic logic has been developed to account for the role of expectations. In this article, the focus is on expectations based on actions and their consequences. The analysis is based on a two-vector model of events where an event is represented in terms of two main components – the force of an action that drives the event, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Events and Causal Mappings Modeled in Conceptual Spaces.Peter Gärdenfors - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On the nature and role of intersubjectivity in communication.Maurizio Tirassa & Francesca M. Bosco - 2008 - In [Book Chapter].
    We outline a theory of human agency and communication and discuss the role that the capability to share (that is, intersubjectivity) plays in it. All the notions discussed are cast in a mentalistic and radically constructivist framework. We also introduce and discuss the relevant literature.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The Evolution of Sentential Structure.Peter Gärdenfors - 2014 - Humana Mente 7 (27).
    The aim of this article is to present an evolutionarily grounded explanation of why we speak in sentences. This question is seldomly addressed, neither in the Chomskian tradition nor in cognitive linguistics. I base my explanation on an analysis of different levels of communication. I identify four levels: praxis, instruction, coordination of common ground and coordination of meaning. The analysis will be focused on the evolutionary benefits of communicating about events as a way of coordinating actions. A cognitively grounded model (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Evolution as connecting first-person and third-person perspectives of consciousness (ASSC12 2008).Christophe Menant - manuscript
    First-person and third-person perspectives are different items of human consciousness. Feeling the taste of a fruit or being consciously part of a group eating fruits call for different perspectives of consciousness. The latter is about objective reality (third-person data). The former is about subjective experience (first-person data) and cannot be described entirely by objective reality. We propose to look at how these two perspectives could be rooted in an evolutionary origin of human consciousness, and somehow be connected. Our starting point (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark