Switch to: References

Citations of:

Elementa philosophiae aristotelico-thomisticae

Friburgi Brisgoviae [etc.]: sumptibus Herder (1909)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On what ontology is and not-is.Karin Verelst - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3):347-370.
    In this paper I investigate the relation between physics and metaphysics in Plato’s participation theory. I show that the logic shoring up Plato’s metaphysics in paraconsistent, as had been suggested already by Graham Priest. The transformation of the paradoxical One-and-Many of the pre-Socratics into a paraconsistent Great-and-Small bridges the abyss between archaic rationality and the world of classical logic based ultimately on the principle of contradiction. Indeed, language is an organ of perception, not simply a means of communication. J. Jaynes, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Renaissance Reading of Aquinas: Thomas Cajetan on the Ontological Status of Essences.Luca Gili - 2012 - Metaphysica 13 (2):217-227.
    Aristotelian philosophers have been always puzzled by the ambiguous status of essences: it is not clear whether an Aristotelian should admit that an essence, taken in itself, is real, even though essences do not exist over and above particular things, as Platonists posit; furthermore, it is not clear whether an Aristotelian should endorse the view that essences have a certain unity, even if they are taken in themselves, namely, by abstracting from the individuals of which they are essences. I tackle (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation