Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-Reported Examination Cheating of Alumni and Enrolled Students: Evidence from Ghana.Christopher Mensah, Edem M. Azila-Gbettor & Vincent Asimah - 2018 - Journal of Academic Ethics 16 (1):89-102.
    This paper investigates differences in the prevalence of self-reported examination cheating behaviours and perception of peer cheating between enrolled students and graduates. A convenience sample of 344 respondents selected from a Ghanaian polytechnic completed self-administered questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test of independence and Mann Whitney test. “Permitting another student to copy your answers during an exam” was the topmost exam cheating method among students. Graduates were more likely than enrolled students to self-report higher examination cheating behaviours. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Time-Lagged Study of the Relationship Between Big Five Personality and Ethical Ideology.Tariq Iqbal Khan, Aisha Akbar, Farooq Ahmed Jam & Muhammad Mohtsham Saeed - 2016 - Ethics and Behavior 26 (6):488-506.
    Our objective is to examine the effects of Big Five personality traits on ethical ideologies using a time-lagged design of 406 employees of higher education institutions in Pakistan. Based on low/high idealism versus relativism, we investigate the conceptual linkage between each of the personality traits and moral philosophy. The results illustrate that extraversion and openness to experience believed on subjectivism moral philosophy, agreeableness believed on situationism, and neuroticism believed on absolutism moral philosophies. In addition, contentiousness believed on exceptionism moral philosophy. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Exploring Individual and Contextual Antecedents of Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Cheating and Plagiarism.Joana R. C. Kuntz & Chandele Butler - 2014 - Ethics and Behavior 24 (6):478-494.
    The purpose of this study was to identify the relative contribution of individual and contextual predictors to students’ attitudes toward the acceptability of cheating and plagiarism. A group of 324 students from a tertiary institution in New Zealand completed an online survey. The findings indicate that gender, justice sensitivity, and understanding of university policies regarding academic dishonesty were the key predictors of the students’ attitudes toward the acceptability of cheating and plagiarism, both as agents of dishonest conduct and as witnesses (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics among first‐year university students.Adèle Thomas & André Van Zyl - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):143-155.
    This study aimed to explore the understanding of and attitudes towards academic ethics of first-year students at a South African University using a paper-based survey that yielded 3611 respondents. A degree of confusion and ambivalence regarding academic ethical issues exists. The relative wealth of respondents also appears to influence the understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics. Millennial students have a tendency to disregard ownership of knowledge. There is a need for instruction in academic ethics to instil an awareness of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Student academic dishonesty: What do academics think and do, and what are the barriers to action?Adele Thomas & Gideon P. De Bruin - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Will Faculty Confront Students Who Cheat? [REVIEW]Arthur Coren - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):171-184.
    Dealing with students who cheat can be one of the most stressful interactions that faculty encounter. This study focused on faculty responses to academic integrity violations and utilized the Theory of Planned Behaviour model to predict the target behaviour of whether faculty would speak face-to-face with a student suspected of cheating. After an elicitation phase to determine modal salient beliefs, a questionnaire was developed to measure the model’s variables. The respondent database contained 206 tenured and non-tenured faculty from two large (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics among first-year university students.Zyl Av Thomas A. - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):143.
    This study aimed to explore the understanding of and attitudes towards academic ethics of first-year students at a South African University using a paper-based survey that yielded 3611 respondents. A degree of confusion and ambivalence regarding academic ethical issues exists. The relative wealth of respondents also appears to influence the understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics. Millennial students have a tendency to disregard ownership of knowledge. There is a need for instruction in academic ethics to instil an awareness of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics among first-year university students.Adèle Thomas & AndréVan Zyl - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):143.
    This study aimed to explore the understanding of and attitudes towards academic ethics of first-year students at a South African University using a paper-based survey that yielded 3611 respondents. A degree of confusion and ambivalence regarding academic ethical issues exists. The relative wealth of respondents also appears to influence the understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics. Millennial students have a tendency to disregard ownership of knowledge. There is a need for instruction in academic ethics to instil an awareness of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • An Examination of Academic Misconduct Intentions and the Ineffectiveness of Syllabus Statements.Sara Staats & Julie M. Hupp - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):239 - 247.
    This experiment uses quantitative and qualitative measures to address the effect of two syllabus statements on academic misconduct: one based on prohibitions and one on academic integrity. Students expressed favorable attitudes toward the statements, showed an increase in guilt compared to a control group, but showed no decrease in intentions to cheat. Including only a standard academic misconduct statement in one's syllabus is not sufficient to alter behavior, which should be acknowledged by faculty.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Influence of Personality on the Decision to Cheat.Melissa McTernan, Patrick Love & David Rettinger - 2014 - Ethics and Behavior 24 (1):53-72.
    Seventeen transgressive behaviors were studied in the context of six personality variables using survey methods. The personality variables were impulsivity, sensation seeking, empathetic perspective taking, guilt, and shame, with social desirability used as a control. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a five-factor model as having the best fit. Those five factors are competitive cheating, self-cheating, school cheating, relationship cheating, and breaking a social contract. A structural equation model indicated that only impulsivity, sensation seeking, and empathetic perspective taking were related to frequency (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Student Perceptions of Faculty Use of Cheating Deterrents.Robert Liebler - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):327-333.
    Evidence is provided on faculty use of cheating deterrents for in-class exams. The evidence comes from a survey of students who report on their most recent in-class exam in a randomly selected course that they are taking. Three types of cheating are considered: (i) advance knowledge of exam questions; (ii) copying; and (iii) other improper student actions during the exam. The deterrents examined consist of the following: (i) a rate of repeating questions; (ii) multiple versions of the exam and seating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations