Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Interpreting Groups and Fields in Some Nonelementary Classes.Tapani Hyttinen, Olivier Lessmann & Saharon Shelah - 2005 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 5 (1):1-47.
    This paper is concerned with extensions of geometric stability theory to some nonelementary classes. We prove the following theorem:Theorem. Let [Formula: see text] be a large homogeneous model of a stable diagram D. Let p, q ∈ SD(A), where p is quasiminimal and q unbounded. Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Suppose that there exists an integer n < ω such that [Formula: see text] for any independent a1, …, an∈ P and finite subset C ⊆ Q, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Simplicity and uncountable categoricity in excellent classes.Tapani Hyttinen & Olivier Lessmann - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 139 (1):110-137.
    We introduce Lascar strong types in excellent classes and prove that they coincide with the orbits of the group generated by automorphisms fixing a model. We define a new independence relation using Lascar strong types and show that it is well-behaved over models, as well as over finite sets. We then develop simplicity and show that, under simplicity, the independence relation satisfies all the properties of nonforking in a stable first order theory. Further, simplicity for an excellent class, as well (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Notes on quasiminimality and excellence.John T. Baldwin - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):334-366.
    This paper ties together much of the model theory of the last 50 years. Shelah's attempts to generalize the Morley theorem beyond first order logic led to the notion of excellence, which is a key to the structure theory of uncountable models. The notion of Abstract Elementary Class arose naturally in attempting to prove the categoricity theorem for L ω 1 ,ω (Q). More recently, Zilber has attempted to identify canonical mathematical structures as those whose theory (in an appropriate logic) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Completeness and categoricity (in power): Formalization without foundationalism.John T. Baldwin - 2014 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20 (1):39-79.
    We propose a criterion to regard a property of a theory (in first or second order logic) as virtuous: the property must have significant mathematical consequences for the theory (or its models). We then rehearse results of Ajtai, Marek, Magidor, H. Friedman and Solovay to argue that for second order logic, ‘categoricity’ has little virtue. For first order logic, categoricity is trivial; but ‘categoricity in power’ has enormous structural consequences for any of the theories satisfying it. The stability hierarchy extends (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Ranks and pregeometries in finite diagrams.Olivier Lessmann - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 106 (1-3):49-83.
    The study of classes of models of a finite diagram was initiated by S. Shelah in 1969. A diagram D is a set of types over the empty set, and the class of models of the diagram D consists of the models of T which omit all the types not in D. In this work, we introduce a natural dependence relation on the subsets of the models for the 0-stable case which share many of the formal properties of forking. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations