Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.Kenneth D. Pimple - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
    The purpose of this paper is to provide a simple yet comprehensive organizing scheme for the responsible conduct of research (RCR). The heuristic offered here should prove helpful in research ethics education, where the many and heterogeneous elements of RCR can be bewildering, as well as research into research integrity and efforts to form RCR policy and regulations. The six domains are scientific integrity, collegiality, protection of human subjects, animal welfare, institutional integrity, and social responsibility.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • New common federal definition of research misconduct in the united states.Stephanie J. Bird & Alicia K. Dustira - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):123-130.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Research misconduct: Why are definitions so elusive?Robert Hauptman - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):443-444.
    This letter is a response to David Guston’s paper “Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempt to Define Scientific Misconduct” which appeared in a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics on Scientific Misconduct.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW]Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.
    Research misconduct has been thoroughly discussed in the literature, but mainly in terms of definitions and prescriptions for proper conduct. Even when case studies are cited, they are generally used as a repository of “lessons learned.” What has been lacking from this conversation is how the lessons of responsible conduct of research are imparted in the first place to graduate students, especially those in technical fields such as engineering. Nor has there been much conversation about who is responsible for what (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct”. [REVIEW]Margaret Dale - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):158-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation