Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A palliative care approach in psychiatry: clinical implications.Mattias Strand, Manne Sjöstrand & Anna Lindblad - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-8.
    BackgroundTraditionally, palliative care has focused on patients suffering from life-threatening somatic diseases such as cancer or progressive neurological disorders. In contrast, despite the often chronic, severely disabling, and potentially life-threatening nature of psychiatric disorders, there are neither palliative care units nor clinical guidelines on palliative measures for patients in psychiatry.Main textThis paper contributes to the growing literature on a palliative approach in psychiatry and is based on the assumption that a change of perspective from a curative to a palliative approach (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Should healthcare professionals sometimes allow harm? The case of self-injury.Patrick J. Sullivan - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):319-323.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Safety in psychiatric inpatient care: The impact of risk management culture on mental health nursing practice.Allie Slemon, Emily Jenkins & Vicky Bungay - 2017 - Nursing Inquiry 24 (4):e12199.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Can supervising self-harm be part of ethical nursing practice?Steven D. Edwards & Jeanette Hewitt - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (1):79-87.
    It was reported in 2006 that a regime of ‘supervised self harm’ had been implemented at St George’s Hospital, Stafford. This involves patients with a history of self-harming behaviour being offered both emotional and practical support to enable them to do so. This support can extend to the provision of knives or razors to enable them to self-harm while they are being supervised by a nurse. This article discusses, and evaluates from an ethical perspective, three competing responses to self-harming behaviours: (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Allowing harm because we care: Self-injury and harm minimisation.Patrick J. Sullivan - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 13 (2):88-97.
    Harm minimisation has been proposed as a means of supporting people who self-injure. When adopting this approach, rather than trying to stop self-injury immediately the person is allowed to injure safely whilst developing more appropriate ways of dealing with distress. The approach is controversial as the health care professional actively allows harm to occur. This paper will consider a specific objection to harm minimisation. That is, it is a misguided collaboration between the health care professional and the person who self-injures (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Transhumanist Fault Line Around Disability: Morphological Freedom and the Obligation to Enhance.H. G. Bradshaw & R. Ter Meulen - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):670-684.
    The transhumanist literature encompasses diverse nonnovel positions on questions of disability and obligation reflecting long-running political philosophical debates on freedom and value choice, complicated by the difficulty of projecting values to enhanced beings. These older questions take on a more concrete form given transhumanist uses of biotechnologies. This paper will contrast the views of Hughes and Sandberg on the obligations persons with "disabilities" have to enhance and suggest a new model. The paper will finish by introducing a distinction between the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations