Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Legal sentence boundary detection using hybrid deep learning and statistical models.Reshma Sheik, Sneha Rao Ganta & S. Jaya Nirmala - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-31.
    Sentence boundary detection (SBD) represents an important first step in natural language processing since accurately identifying sentence boundaries significantly impacts downstream applications. Nevertheless, detecting sentence boundaries within legal texts poses a unique and challenging problem due to their distinct structural and linguistic features. Our approach utilizes deep learning models to leverage delimiter and surrounding context information as input, enabling precise detection of sentence boundaries in English legal texts. We evaluate various deep learning models, including domain-specific transformer models like LegalBERT and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Classifying proportionality - identification of a legal argument.Kilian Lüders & Bent Stohlmann - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-28.
    Proportionality is a central and globally spread argumentation technique in public law. This article provides a conceptual introduction to proportionality and argues that such a domain-specific form of argumentation is particularly interesting for argument mining. As a major contribution of this article, we share a new dataset for which proportionality has been annotated. The dataset consists of 300 German Federal Constitutional Court decisions annotated at the sentence level (54,929 sentences). In addition to separating textual parts, a fine-grained system of proportionality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • I beg to differ: how disagreement is handled in the annotation of legal machine learning data sets.Daniel Braun - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (3):839-862.
    Legal documents, like contracts or laws, are subject to interpretation. Different people can have different interpretations of the very same document. Large parts of judicial branches all over the world are concerned with settling disagreements that arise, in part, from these different interpretations. In this context, it only seems natural that during the annotation of legal machine learning data sets, disagreement, how to report it, and how to handle it should play an important role. This article presents an analysis of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation