Switch to: References

Citations of:

Reply

Constellations 28 (1):67-78 (2021)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Conceptual Plurality in Jürgen Habermas’s Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie.Amos Nascimento - 2024 - Res Philosophica 101 (2):401-430.
    In Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie (Also a History of Philosophy), Jürgen Habermas weaves together various themes such as faith and knowledge, history and theology, naturalism and epistemic justification, learning processes and moral development as well as multiculturalism and deliberative democracy in a transnational public sphere. This article argues that to articulate these multiple elements, Habermas adopts a robust framework built upon four conceptual pillars that can be clearly identified: postmetaphysical, postconventional, postnational, and postsecular. This “conceptual plurality” underlies his genealogy (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Regulating Disagreement, Constituting Participants: A Critique of Proceduralist Theories of Democracy.Darrin Hicks & Lenore Langsdorf - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (2):139-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Postmodernity and desire.Scott Lash - 1985 - Theory and Society 14 (1):1-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • What the controversy over ‘the reasonable’ reveals: On Habermas’s Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie.Alessandro Ferrara - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (3):313-332.
    This article discusses Jürgen Habermas’s latest book Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie from the specific angle of what the section on Rawls indicates about the overall philosophical project pursued by Habermas. This tiny element within the imposing architecture reveals a structural problem that affects Habermas’s program for a detranscendentalization of reason. After a general premise, Habermas’s appraisal of Rawls’s work is reconstructed and critically examined. Then, in the guise of a Rawlsian rejoinder, a problematic understanding of pluralism is shown to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Habermas/Rawls debate.Kenneth Baynes - 2019 - Contemporary Political Theory 20 (3):140-143.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Intractable conflicts and moral objectivity: A dialogical, problem-based approach.William Rehg - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):229 – 257.
    According to the standard version of discourse ethics (e.g. as formulated by Apel, Habermas, and others), the objectivity of moral norms resides in their intersubjective acceptability under idealized conditions of discourse. These accounts have been criticized for not taking sufficient account of contextual particularities and the realities of actual discourse. This essay addresses such objections by proposing a more realistic, contextualist 'principle of real moral discourse' (RMD). RMD is derived from a more comprehensive concept of objectivity that links intersubjective objectivity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Political Reasonableness: A Content Analysis of the New York Times 1860-2004.Darrin Hicks, Robert Margesson & Kristine Warrenburg - unknown
    This paper reports the preliminary results of a content analysis of the use and functions of reasonableness in the New York Times editorial page from 1860-2004. We begin by setting out several reasons why we should devote our critical attention to the concept of reasonableness. We then justify our choice of the New York Times editorial page and describe our sample and analytic method. The body of the paper reports three results. First, the primary meanings of the concept are detailed. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Habermas’s epistemic conception of democracy: Some reactions to McCarthy’s objections.Stéphane Courtois - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (7):842-866.
    The article aims at assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the objections to Habermas’s epistemic conception of democracy raised by Thomas McCarthy in some of his essays. The author defends two ideas. First, he contends that McCarthy is mistaken in believing that democratic debates would not be a matter of consensus. In this regard, two arguments are raised, showing that the search for agreement and consensus by citizens in public forums can hardly be dismissed and that consensus can be invested (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Habermas/Rawls debate.Kenneth Baynes - 2019 - Contemporary Political Theory:1-4.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark