Switch to: References

Citations of:

Neuroethics of free will

In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 219 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Indirect Compatibilism.Andrew James Latham - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Sydney
    In this thesis, I will defend a new kind of compatibilist account of free action, indirect conscious control compatibilism (or indirect compatibilism for short), and argue that some of our actions are free according to it. My argument has three components, and involves the development of a brand new tool for experimental philosophy, and the use of cognitive neuroscience. The first component of the argument shows that compatibilism (of some kind) is a conceptual truth. Contrary to the current orthodoxy in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • How Libet-Style Experiments May Challenge Lay Theories of Free Will.Jason Shepard - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (1):45-47.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Neurostructure of Morality and the Hubris of Memory Manipulation.Peter A. Depergola Ii - 2018 - The New Bioethics 24 (3):199-227.
    Neurotechnologies that promise to dampen (via pharmacologicals), disassociate (via electro-convulsive therapy), erase (via deep brain stimulation), and replace (via false memory creation) unsavory episodic memories are no longer the subject of science fiction. They have already arrived, and their funding suggests that they will not disappear anytime soon. In light of their emergence, this essay examines the neurostructure of normative morality to clarify that memory manipulation, which promises to take away that which is bad in human experience, also removes that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Neurostructure of Morality and the Hubris of Memory Manipulation.I. I. Peter A. DePergola - 2018 - The New Bioethics 24 (3):199-227.
    Neurotechnologies that promise to dampen (via pharmacologicals), disassociate (via electro-convulsive therapy), erase (via deep brain stimulation), and replace (via false memory creation) unsavory episodic memories are no longer the subject of science fiction. They have already arrived, and their funding suggests that they will not disappear anytime soon. In light of their emergence, this essay examines the neurostructure of normative morality to clarify that memory manipulation, which promises to take away that which is bad in human experience, also removes that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • My Brain Made me not Do it: an Emergentist Interpretation of Benjamin Libet.Daniel Pallarés-Domínguez - 2016 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 7 (7):121-141.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Neuroethics at 15: Keep the Kant but Add More Bacon.Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Peter Zuk, Stacey Pereira, Kristin Kostick, Laura Torgerson, Demetrio Sierra-Mercado, Mary Majumder, J. Blumenthal-Barby, Eric A. Storch, Wayne K. Goodman & Amy L. McGuire - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (3):97-100.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations