Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Libertarian Rectification: Restitution, Retribution, and the Risk-Multiplier.J. C. Lester - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2/3):287-297.
    Libertarians typically object to having the state deal with law and order for several general reasons: it is inefficient; it is carried out at the expense of taxpayers; and it punishes so-called victimless crimes. Exactly what the observance of liberty implies with respect to the treatment of tortfeasors and criminals is more controversial among libertarians. A pure theory of libertarian restitution and retribution is mainly what is attempted here, without becoming involved in general moral anti-state arguments. However, the pure theory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Restitution: Pure or punitive?Richard Dagger - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):29-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Restitutionism Defended.Joseph Ellin - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2/3):299-317.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Rights to Punish for Libertarians.Jordan Howard Sobel - 1995 - Dialogue 34 (4):675-.
    Thomas Hurka derives rights to punish from what I will term the Libertarian Rights Principle, which is “that there is really only one natural right, namely the equal right of all persons to the most extensive liberty compatible with a like liberty for other persons, and that all other natural rights are species or instances of the right to liberty.” These rights to punish, he says, extend only to punishing violators of rights, never to “punishing” the innocent; extend only to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark