Switch to: References

Citations of:

The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning

Kai Hakkarainen & Matti Sintonen

Science & Education 11 (1):25-43 (2002)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

The Holmesian logician: Sherlock Holmes’ “Science of Deduction and Analysis” and the logic of discovery.Emmanuel J. Genot - 2020 - Synthese 198 (11):1-18.details This paper examines whether Sherlock Holmes’ “Science of Deduction and Analysis,” as reconstructed by Hintikka and Hintikka The sign of three: Peirce, Dupin, Holmes, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1983), exemplifies a logic of discovery. While the Hintikkas claimed it does, their approach remained largely programmatic, and ultimately unsuccessful. Their reconstruction must thus be expanded, in particular to account for the role of memory in inquiry. Pending this expansion, the Hintikkas’ claim is vindicated. However, a tension between the naturalistic aspirations of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Can Başkent, Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016. [REVIEW]Francesca Poggiolesi - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (4):555-560.details Book Reviews: Can Başkent, Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2, 978-3-319-20762-9. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20762-9. Download Export citation Bookmark
Three Abductive Solutions to the Meno Paradox – with Instinct, Inference, and Distributed Cognition.Sami Paavola & Kai Hakkarainen - 2005 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 24 (3):235-253.details This article analyzes three approaches to resolving the classical Meno paradox, or its variant, the learning paradox, emphasizing Charles S. Peirce’s notion of abduction. Abduction provides a way of dissecting those processes where something new, or conceptually more complex than before, is discovered or learned. In its basic form, abduction is a “weak” form of inference, i.e., it gives only tentative suggestions for further investigation. But it is not too weak if various sources of clues and restrictions on the abductive (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 15 citations
Remembering, Reflecting, Reframing: Examining Students’ Long-Term Perceptions of an Innovative Model for University Teaching.Giuseppe Ritella, Rosa Di Maso, Katherine McLay, Susanna Annese & Maria Beatrice Ligorio - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.details This article presents a follow-up examination of 10 iterations of a blended course on educational psychology and e-learning carried out at the University of Bari. All iterations of the course considered in this study were designed using the Constructive and Collaborative Participation (CCP) model. Our main research questions are: What are the students’ long lasting memories of this course? How do the students use the skills and the competences acquired through the course across an extended period of time? In line (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Abduction with Dialogical and Trialogical Means.Sami Paavola, Kai Hakkarainen & Matti Sintonen - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):137-150.details In this paper we maintain that abductive inferential processes should be embedded to a more general outlook on human cognition. Abduction has clear a.nities to the so-called interrogative model of inquiry in which inquiry and reasoning are conceptualized as a dialogue. We think, in addition, that dialogicality must be broadened to a “trialogical” framework which means a threefold relationship with mediating artefacts where the inquirer, other inquirers , and the object of knowledge are inextricably bound up with each other in (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 5 citations

1