Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Detailing Judicial Difference.Erika Rackley - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (1):11-26.
    In January 2004 Baroness Brenda Hale became the first woman to sit on the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. Five years on, she has brought to her judicial role a lightness of touch that belies her increasingly significant impact on the court’s jurisprudence. Early forecasts that she would be “just a bit different” from her male companions have proved prophetic. However such assessments have stemmed primarily from a focus on her decision-making on a case-by-case basis. But what of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Continuing Use of Problematic Sexual Stereotypes in Judicial Decision-Making.Jesse Elvin - 2010 - Feminist Legal Studies 18 (3):275-297.
    This article examines the continuing use of problematic sexual stereotypes at appellate level in the English and Welsh legal system. Using five cases as illustrations, it argues that, notwithstanding professional training and guidance on sexual equality matters, certain senior judges in this jurisdiction still at least sometimes openly employ crude and problematic sexual stereotypes in their judgments or fail to deal appropriately with the use of these stereotypes by trial judges. The central point is that there is still a significant (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark