Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Giving Children a Say without Giving Them a Choice: Obtaining Affirmation of a child’s Non-dissent to Participation in Nonbeneficial Research.Holly Kantin - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):80-97.
    :To what extent, if any, should minors have a say about whether they participate in research that offers them no prospect of direct benefit? This article addresses this question as it pertains to minors who cannot understand enough about what their participation would involve to make an autonomous choice, but can comprehend enough to have and express opinions about participating. The first aim is to defend David Wendler and Seema Shah’s claim that minors who meet this description should not be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Research Ethics and Justice: The Case of Finland.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):551-576.
    Abstract:This paper explores how Finnish research ethics deals with matters of justice on the levels of practical regulation, political morality, and theoretical studies. The bioethical sets of principles introduced by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in the United States and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff and Peter Kemp in Europe provide the conceptual background, together with a recently introduced conceptual map of theories of justice and their dimensions. The most striking finding is that the internationally recognized requirement of informed consent for research (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • We should reject passive resignation in favor of requiring the assent of younger children for participation in nonbeneficial research.Robert M. Nelson & William W. Reynolds - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):11 – 13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations