Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Euripides' Heracles in the Flesh.Brooke Holmes - 2008 - Classical Antiquity 27 (2):231-281.
    In this article, I analyze the role of Heracles' famous body in the representation of madness and its aftermath in Euripides' Heracles. Unlike studies of Trachiniae, interpretations of Heracles have neglected the hero's body in Euripides. This reading examines the eruption of that body midway through the tragedy as a part of Heracles that is daemonic and strange, but also integral to his identity. Central to my reading is the figure of the symptom, through which madness materializes onstage. Symptoms were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • New Diseases and Sectarian Debate in Hellenistic and Roman Medicine.Arthur Harris - 2022 - Apeiron 55 (2):167-191.
    Ancient medical practitioners discussed and debated whether previously unknown kinds of disease had been discovered and whether new diseases could come into existence. The debate over new diseases was of fundamental importance in defining the medical sects which came to dominate elite medicine from the Hellenistic period. This paper offers an overview of the most significant Greek and Roman sources for the debate over new diseases and an account of the origins and significance of this debate.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Justice and Pollution in the Euthyphro.Mark L. McPherran - 2002 - Apeiron 35 (2):105 - 129.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Aux limites de l’explication : le rôle de la sympathie chez Galien.Julien Devinant - 2021 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 42 (1):117-142.
    This paper aims to assess the epistemological value of the notion of sympathy in Galen’s thought. It first shows that Galen makes use of two different concepts of sympathy: the ambient concept, according to which the human body manifests a harmonious part-whole relationship, and the technical concept, with which one connects two pathologies on the basis of the fact that the cause of the ailment is elsewhere than where it surfaces. Neither of these sympathies constitutes in itself a causal explanation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark