Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Ontology Wars.Francesca Manning - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (1):201-220.
    Pierre Macherey’sHegel or Spinoza?suggests that Hegel was driven to his now legendary misinterpretations of Spinoza because he could not accept Spinozism without compromising his own philosophy. Macherey shows us a Spinoza that pre-emptively resists and challenges Hegel’s understanding of Spirit as Subject realising itself through self-negation and contradiction. This review draws out the central arguments in the book, and those arguments most salient for contemporary theories of capitalism and revolution, and points towards possible implications for Marxist theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Introduction to ‘The Change in the Original Plan for Marx’s Capital and Its Causes’.Rick Kuhn - 2013 - Historical Materialism 21 (3):117-137.
    In his essay, Henryk Grossman made a powerful case for the continued relevance of Marxist economics. He argued thatCapitalis a fundamentally coherent whole, structured by Marx’s method of moving systematically from more abstract to more concrete levels of analysis. Despite considerable subsequent debate and research, Grossman’s account remains the outstanding contribution to our understanding of this aspect of Marx’s principal work.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Critique of the Equation and the Phenomenology of Production.Frederick H. Pitts - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (3):228-239.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom, David Harvey, New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Pete Green - 2012 - Historical Materialism 20 (4):213-225.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark