Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Equifinality and phase-resetting: The role of control parameter manipulations.R. E. A. van Emmerik & R. C. Wagenaar - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):783-784.
    It is argued that the equilibrium point model can lead to new insights regarding transition and stability processes in movement coordination. The role of movement control parameters on equifinality and phase-resetting is discussed; not only control but also external control parameters can affect the global dynamical regime.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Interneurons as backseat drivers and the elusive control variable.T. Richard Nichols - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):772-773.
    It is proposed here that the spinal network of proprioceptive feedback from length and force receptors constitutes the mechanism underlying the coordination of activation thresholds for muscles acting about the same and neighboring joints. For the most part, these circuits come between motoneurons and supraspinal signals, invalidating the idea that the activation thresholds constitute control variables for the motor system.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Frames of reference interact and are task-dependent.Bruce A. Kay - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):765-765.
    The problem for the CNS in any particular movement task is to coordinate the various frames of reference appropriate to the task. Control variables are determined by this coordination. The coordination problem varies greatly from task to task, and so no single set of control variables is likely to account for a broad range of movement tasks.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The lambda model and a hemispheric motor model of intentional hand movements.Uri Fidelman - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):750-751.
    The lambda model of Feldman & Levin for intentional hand movement is compared with a hemispheric motor model (IIMM). Both models imply similar conclusions independently. This increases the validity of both models.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is λ an appropriate control variable for locomotion?Thomas M. Hamm & Zong-Sheng Han - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):761-762.
    The lambda model predicts that the command received by each motor nucleus during locomotion is specific for the joint at which its muscle acts and is independent of external conditions. However, investigation of the commands received by motor nuclei during fictive locomotion and of the sensitivity of these commands to feedback from the limb during locomotion indicates that neither condition is satisfied.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The unobservability of central commands: Why testing hypotheses is so difficult.Antony Hodgson - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):763-764.
    The experiments Feldman and Levin suggest do not definitively test their proposed solution to the problem of selecting muscle activations. Their test of the movement directions that elicit EMG activity can be interpreted without regard to the form of the central commands, and their fast elbow flexion test is based on a forward computation that obscures the insensitivity of the predicted trajectory to the details of the putative commands.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Grip force adjustments during rapid hand movements suggest that detailed movement kinematics are predicted.J. Randall Flanagan, James R. Tresilian & Alan M. Wing - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):753-754.
    The λ model suggests that detailed kinematics arise from changes in control variables and need not be explicitly planned. However, we have shown that when moving a grasped object, grip force is precisely modulated in phase with acceleration-dependent inertial load. This suggests that the motor system can predict detailed kinematics. This prediction may be based on a forward model of the dynamics of the loaded limb.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reciprocal and coactivation commands are not sufficient to describe muscle activation patterns.C. C. A. M. Gielen & B. van Bolhuis - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):754-755.
    Recent results have shown that the relative activation of muscles is different for isometric contractions and for movements. These results exclude an explanation of muscle activation patterns by a combination ofreciprocal and coactivation commands. These results also indicate that joint stiffness is not uniquely determined and that it may be different for isometric contractions and movements.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How far should we extend the equilibrium point (lambda) hypothesis?Jack M. Winters - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):785-786.
    A key feature of the lambda model is the hypothesis of a local spring-like muscle-reflex system defined by a central control variable that has units of position. This is intriguing, especially for a study of postural stability in large-scale systems, but it has limited direct application to skilled everyday movements. If movement is considered as a goal-directed, neuro-optimization problem, however, theavailabilityof lambda-like peripheral models (vs. conventional musculoskeletal models) deserves exploration.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can the λ model benefit from understanding human adaptation in weightlessness(and vice versa)?P. Vernon McDonald - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):768-768.
    Parameters of the lambda model seem tightly linked to certain characteristics of human performance influenced by weightlessness. This commentary suggests that there is a valuable opportunity to probe the lambda model using the changed environment experienced during space flight. The likely benefits are a better model and a better understanding ofthe consequences of weightlessness for human performance.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do control variables exist?Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos & William H. Warren - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):762-762.
    We argue that the concept of a control variable (CV) as described by Feldman and Levin needs to be revised because it does not account for the influence of sensory feedback from the periphery. We provide evidence from the realm of rhythmic movements that sensory feedback can permanently alter the frequency and phase of a centrally generated rhythm.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Shifting frames of reference but the same old point of view.Gerald L. Gottlieb - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):758-758.
    Models of central control variables (CVs) that are expressed in positional reference frames and rely on proprioception as the dominant specifier of muscle activation patterns have not yet been shown to be adequate for the description of fast, voluntary movement, even of single joints. An alternative model with illustrative data is proposed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The lambda model is only one piece in the motor control puzzle.Jeffrey Dean - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):749-749.
    The lambda model provides a physiologically grounded terminology for describing muscle function and emphasizes the important influence of environmental and reflex-mediated effects on final states. However, lambda itself is only a convenient point on the length-tension curve; its importance should not be overemphasized. Ascribing movement to changes in a lambda-based frame of reference is generally valid, but it leaves unanswered a number of questions concerning mechanisms.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is the multi-joint pointing movement model applicable to equilibrium control during upper trunk movements?Alexey Alexandrov, Alexander Frolov & Jean Massion - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):745-746.
    Two aspects of the target article, (1) the extension of the equilibrium point theory to multi-joint movements, and (2) the consequence that the EMG pattern is not directly controlled by the central nervous system (CNS), are discussed in light of the experiments on upper trunk bending in humans. The principle component kinematic analysis and the analysis of the EMG data, obtained under microgravity and additional loading conditions, support the application of Feldman and Levin's for multi-joint pointing movement to equilibrium control (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control.Anatol G. Feldman & Mindy F. Levin - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):723-744.
    A hypothesis about sensorimotor integration (the λ model) is described and applied to movement control and kinesthesia. The central idea is that the nervous system organizes positional frames of reference for the sensorimotor apparatus and produces active movements by shifting the frames in terms of spatial coordinates. Kinematic and electromyographic patterns are not programmed, but emerge from the dynamic interaction among the system s components, including external forces within the designated frame of reference. Motoneuronal threshold properties and proprioceptive inputs to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Levers to generate movement.U. Windhorst - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):784-785.
    The following questions are discussed: (1) Who determines the nature of “control variables”? (2) Is the “positional monopoly” healthy? (3) Does a descending command alter reflex threshold alone without eoncomitantly altering stiffness? (4) How does the CNS deal with history-dependent effects? (5) Should we abandon the idea that the CNS controls classical Newtonian variables such as muscle length?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kinematic invariances and body schema.Pietro Morasso & Vittorio Sanguineti - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):769-770.
    Generalizing the notion that muscles are positional frames of reference, a high-dimensional muscle space is defined for multi-muscle systems with an embedded low-dimensional motor manifold of functional articulators. A central representation of such a manifold is proposed as computational body schema. The example of the jaw-tongue system is presented, discussing the relation of functional articulators with kinematic invariances and control problems.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Equilibrium-point control? Yes! Deterministic mechanisms of control? No!Mark L. Latash - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):765-766.
    The equilibrium-point hypothesis (the λ-model) is superior to all other models of single-joint control and provides deep insights into the mechanisms of control of multi-joint movements. Attempts at associating control variables with neurophysiological variables look confusing rather than promising. Probabilistic mechanisms may play an important role in movement generation in redundant systems.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A few reasons why psychologlsts can adhere to Feldman and Levin's model.Mireille Bonnard & Jean Pailhous - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):746-747.
    We emphasize the relevance to cognitive psychology of Feldman and Levin's theoretical position. Traditional views of motor control have failed to clearly separate “production control” at the level of motor command, based on task-independent CV (control variables), from intentional “product control” based on task-dependent parameters. Because F&L's approach concentrates on the first process (trajectory formation), it can distinguish the product control stage.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Frameworks on shifting sands.R. Lngvaldsen & H. T. A. Whiting - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):764-765.
    Feldman and Levin present a model for movement control in which the system is said to seek equilibrium points, active movement being produced by shifting frames of reference in space. It is argued that whatever merit this model might have is limited to an understanding of “the how” and not “the why” we move. In this way the authors seem to be forced into a dualistic position leaving the upper level of the proposed control hierarchy “floating.”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What can we expect from models of motor control?Gerald E. Loeb - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):767-768.
    The lambda model of servocontrol seems superior to the alpha model in terms of dealing with the mechanical complexities of nonlinear and multiarticular muscles. Both, however, can be trivialized by noting that the “control variable” may simply be the sum of descending influences at propriospinal interneurons in the case of the lambda model or in the muscles themselves in the case of the alpha model. The notion that the brain explicitly computes output in terms of any such control variables may (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Control parameters, equilibria, and coordination dynamics.Dagmar Sternad & M. T. Turvey - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):780-780.
    Important similarities exist between the dynamical concepts implicit in Feldman & Levin's extended λ model and those basic to a dynamical systems approach. We argue that careful application of the key concepts of control and order parameters, equilibria, and stability, can relate known facts of neuromuscular processes to the observables of functional, task-specific behavior.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Spatial frames for motor control would be commensurate with spatial frames for vision and proprioception, but what about control of energy flows?Christopher C. Pagano & Geoffrey P. Bingham - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):773-773.
    The model identifies a spatial coordinate frame within which the sensorimotor apparatus produces movement. Its spatial nature simplifies its coupling with spatial reference frames used concurrently by vision and proprioception. While the positional reference frame addresses the performance of spatial tasks, it seems to have little to say about movements involving energy expenditure as the principle component of the task.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moving models of motion forward: Explication and a new concept.Thomas G. Fikes & James T. Townsend - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):751-753.
    We affirm the dynamical systems approach taken by Feldman and Levin, but argue that a more mathematically rigorous and standard exposition of the model according to dynamical systems theory would greatly increase readability and testability. Such an explication would also have heuristic value, suggesting new variations of the model. We present one such variant, a new solution to the redundancy problem.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The λ model for motor control: More than meets the eye.Mindy F. Levin & Anatol G. Feldman - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):786-806.
    Understanding of the λ model has greatly increased in recent years as evidenced by most of the commentaries. Some commentators underscored the potential of the model to integrate aspects of different sensorimotor systems in the production of movement. Other commentators focused on not-yet-fully-developed parts of the model. A few persisted in misunderstanding some of its basic concepts, and on these grounds they reject it. In responding to commentaries we continue to elaborate on some fundamental points of the model, especially control (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The case of the missing CVs: Multi-joint primitives.Simon Giszter - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):755-756.
    The search for simplifying principles in motor control motivates the target article. One method that the CNS uses to simplify the task of controlling a limb's mechanical properties is absent from the article. Evidence from multi-joint, force-field measurements and from kinematics that points to the existence of multi-joint primitives as control variables is discussed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Conservative or nonconservative control schemes.Daniel M. Corcos & Kerstin Pfann - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):747-749.
    The conservative strategy proposed by the authors suggests a solution of the degrees-of-freedom problem of the controller. However, several simple motor control tasks cannot be explained by this strategy. A nonconservative strategy, in which more parameters of the control signal vary, can account for these simple motor tasks. However, the simplicity that distinguishes the proposed model from many others is lost.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inverse kinematic problem: Solutions by pseudoinversion, inversion and no-inversion.Simon R. Goodman - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):756-758.
    Kinematic properties of reaching movements reflect constraints imposed on the joint angles. Contemporary models present solutions to the redundancy problem by a pseudoinverse procedure (Whitney 1969) or without any inversion (Berkenblit et al. 1986). Feldman & Levin suggest a procedure based on a regular inversion. These procedures are considered as an outcome of a more general approach.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Let us accept a “controlled trade-off” model of motor control.Lloyd D. Partridge - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):773-775.
    The trade-off between force and length of muscle as adjusted by neural signals is a critical fact in the dynamics of motor control. Whether we call it “length-tension effect,” “feedback-like,” “invariant condition,” or “spring-like” is unimportant. We must not let semantics or details of representation obscure the basic physics of effects introduced by this trade-off in muscle.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Twisted pairs: Does the motor system really care about joint configurations?Patrick Haggard, Chris Miall & John Stein - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):758-761.
    Extrapersonal frames of reference for aimed movements are representationally convenient. They may, however, carry associated costs when the movement is executed in terms of the complex coordination of multiple joints they require. Studies that have measured both fingertip and joint paths suggest the motor systems may seek a compromise between simplicity of extrapersonal spatial representation and computational simplicity of multi-joint execution.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Origins of origins of motor control.Esther Thelen - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):780-783.
    Examination of infant spontaneous and goal-directed arm movements supports Feldman and Levin's hypothesis of a functional hierarchy. Early infant movements are dominated by biomechanical and dynamic factors without external frames of reference. Development involves not only learning to generate these frames of reference, but also protecting the higher-level goal of the movement from internal and external perturbations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Biological variability and control of movements via δλ.Charles E. Wright & Rebecca A. States - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):786-786.
    Three issues related to Feldman and Levin's treatment of biological variability are discussed. We question the usefulness of the indirect component of δλ. We suggest that trade-offs between speed and accuracy in aimed movements support identification of δλ, rather than λ, as a control variable. We take issue with the authors' proposal for resolving redundancy in multi-joint movements, given recent data.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Position is everything?Karl H. Pribram - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):776-778.
    Neurophysiological evidence consonant with F&L's lambda model is reviewed and results of additional experiments are presented. The evidence shows that there are neurons in the motor cortex that respond to selective band widths of passive sinusoidal movements; the additional data show how, with movement, directionally sensitive population vectors can be shown to emerge from the data.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Command invariants and the frame of reference for human movement.David J. Ostry, Rafael Laboissière & Paul L. Gribble - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):770-772.
    We describe a solution to the redundancy problem related to that proposed in Feldman & Levin's target article. We suggest that the system may use a fixed mapping between commands organized at the level of degrees of freedom and commands to individual muscles. This proposal eliminates the need to maintain an explicit representation of musculoskeletalgeometry in planning movements.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Natural unconstrained movements obey rules different from constrained elementary movements.Michel Desmurget, Yves Rossetti & Claude Prablanc - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):750-750.
    The concept of a conservative control strategy minimizing the number of degrees of freedom used is criticised with reference to 3-D simple reaching and grasping experiments. The vector error in a redundant system would not be the prime controlled variable, but rather the posture for reaching, as exemplified by nearly straight displacements in joint space as opposed to curved ones in task space.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two joints are more than twice one joint.Jeroen B. J. Smeets - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):779-780.
    An alternative multi-joint extension to the lambda model is proposed. According to this extension, the activity of a muscle depends not only on the difference between lambda and length of that muscle, but also on the difference between lambda and length of other muscles. This 2-D extension can describe more neurophysiological experiments than the extension proposed in the target article.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can the λ model be used to interpret the activity of single neurons?Stephen H. Scott - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):778-779.
    Whereas the λ model provides a useful technique to describe complex movements, the focus on control variables in this model limits its potential for interpreting the activity and function of many cells in motor areas of the CNS.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The λ model: Can it walk?Aftab E. Patla - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):775-776.
    Generation of swing phase limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion should be a reasonable test for the λ model proposed by Feldman and Levin. The observed features such as lack of simple amplitude scaling of endpoint (toe) trajectories for different obstacle heights, complex shaped toe velocity profiles, and exploitation of passive intersegmental dynamics to control limb elevation cannot be adequately explained by the λ model.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What does body configuration in microgravity tell us about the contribution of intra- and extrapersonal frames of reference for motor control?F. Lestienne, M. Ghafouri & F. Thullier - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):766-767.
    The authors report that the reorganization of body configuration during weightlessness is based on an intrapersonal frame of reference such as the configuration of the support surface and the position of the body's center of gravity. These results stress the importance of “knowledge” of the state of internal geometric structures, which cannot be directly signalled by specific receptors responsible for direct dialogue with the physical external world.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Tendon elasticity and positional control.R. McN Alexander - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):745-745.
    The spring-like behaviour of a joint following a sudden change of torque is partly a result of the elastic properties of tendons. A large fall in a muscle with a long tendon may be accompanied by tendon recoil causing joint movements as large as 20°.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark