Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture: An Introduction

Cambridge University Press (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The separation between ethics and politics: Max Weber on ancient Judaism and modernity.Eyal Chowers - 2022 - European Journal of Social Theory 25 (3):477-495.
    For Max Weber, modernity is characterized by a tragic conflict among value spheres, each claiming to possess the ‘true meaning’ of human life. In particular, Weber argues that while the political sphere is dominated by the unifying, exclusionary, power-driven, and war-prone nation state, the ethical sphere is characterized by the universalization of individually based, deontological norms. For Weber, I argue, the modern separation between the ethical and political spheres originates in ancient Judaism. His work on Judaism, mostly neglected by political (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to Yoram Hazony, The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture.C. L. Brinks - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2:238-249.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • God is Where God Acts: Reconceiving Divine Omnipresence.James M. Arcadi - 2017 - Topoi 36 (4):631-639.
    In classical theism, God is typically conceived of as having the attribute of omnipresence. However, this attribute often falls prey to two puzzles, the immateriality puzzle and the intensity puzzle. A recent explication of omnipresence by Hud Hudson falls short of solving these puzzles. By attending to key narratives in the Hebrew Scriptures, I argue that one ought to conceive of God’s presence at a location as God’s acting at that location. Thus, God’s omnipresence is God’s acting at all locations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Aristotle’s ›Parva naturalia‹: Text, Translation, and Commentary.Ronald Polansky (ed.) - 2024 - De Gruyter.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Our Farmer Abraham: The Binding of Isaac and Willing What God Wills.David Worsley - 2018 - Journal of Analytic Theology 6:204-216.
    In The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture, Yoram Hazony suggests that it is part of Rabbinic tradition that in the Akedah, Abraham never intended to sacrifice Isaac. In a recent paper, Sam Lebens argued that in making this claim, Hazony is misrepresenting Rabbinic tradition. In this paper, I show that Hazony can concede to Lebens’s argument and still have something interesting to say about the Akedah, namely, that it provides an opportunity to reflect on what might happen when a ‘Shepherd’ is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Experiencing the Word of God: Reading as Wrestling.David Worsley - 2017 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 1 (1):78-93.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Narrative as Philosophy: Methodological Issues in Abstracting from Hebrew Scripture.Jessica Wilson - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2:271-281.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Abraham, Isaac, and the Toxin: a Kavkan reading of the binding of Isaac.Christopher Willard-Kyle - forthcoming - Religious Studies:1-17.
    I argue that the story of God’s commanding Abraham to sacrifice Isaac can be read as a variant of Kavka’s (1983) Toxin Puzzle. On this reading, Abraham has no reason to kill Isaac, only reason to intend to kill Isaac. On one version of the Kavkan reading, it’s impossible for Abraham, thus situated, to form the intention to kill Isaac. This would make the binding an impossible story: I explore the ethical and theological consequences of reading the story in this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Antitheist meets the Shepherd: A response to Yoram Hazony’s The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture.Randal Rauser - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2:261-270.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Metaphor and the Mind of God in Nevi’im.S. N. Nordby - 2018 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 2 (1):51-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Ashes of Isaac and the Nature of Jewish Philosophy.Samuel Lebens - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:500-514.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Hebrew Philosophy or Jewish Theology? A False Dichotomy.Samuel Lebens - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2:250-260.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Three Replies: On Revelation, Natural Law and Jewish Autonomy in Theology.Yoram Hazony - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:172-205.
    I address three key questions in Jewish theology that have come up in readers’ criticism of my book The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture: How should we think about God’s revelation to man if, as I have proposed, the sharp distinction between divine revelation and human reason is alien to the Hebrew Bible and classical rabbinic sources? Is the biblical Law of Moses intended to be a description of natural law, suggesting the path to life and the good for all nations? (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Loyalty of Religious Disagreement.Katherine Dormandy - 2021 - In Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 238-270.
    Religious disagreement, like disagreement in science, stands to deliver important epistemic benefits. But religious communities tend to frown on it. A salient reason is that, whereas scientists should be neutral toward the topics they discuss, religious believers should be loyal to God; and religious disagreement, they argue, is disloyal. For it often involves discussion with people who believe more negatively about God than you do, putting you at risk of forming negative beliefs yourself. And forming negative beliefs about someone, or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation