Switch to: References

Citations of:

Formal Philosophy

Automatic Press/VIP (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Experimental philosophy within its proper bounds.John Symons - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):586-606.
    ABSTRACT In Philosophy Within its Proper Bounds, Édouard Machery argues that the results of experimental philosophy should lead us to abandon much of traditional philosophical practice. In its place Machery defends naturalized conceptual analysis as a more modest and pragmatic alternative to standard analytic philosophy. This paper argues that Machery overstates the metaphilosophical significance of x-phi’s results. We can and should keep many of the insights and good methodological habits that come with x-phi. However, if one is not already convinced (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Explanation in philosophy and the limits of precision.Rebecca Bendick & Albert Borgmann - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (2):167-174.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Formal Epistemology.Gregory Wheeler - 2010 - In Andrew Cullison (ed.), A Companion to Epistemology. New York: Continuum Press.
    Yet, in broader terms, formal epistemology is not merely a methodological tool for epistemologists, but a discipline in its own right. On this programmatic view, formal epistemology is an interdisciplinary research program that covers work by philosophers, mathematicians, computer scientists, statisticians, psychologists, operations researchers, and economists who aim to give mathematical and sometimes computational representations of, along with sound strategies for reasoning about, knowledge, belief, judgment and decision making.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On Logic in the Law: "Something, but not All".Susan Haack - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31.
    In 1880, when Oliver Wendell Holmes (later to be a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) criticized the logical theology of law articulated by Christopher Columbus Langdell (the first Dean of Harvard Law School), neither Holmes nor Langdell was aware of the revolution in logic that had begun, the year before, with Frege's Begriffsschrift. But there is an important element of truth in Holmes's insistence that a legal system cannot be adequately understood as a system of axioms and corollaries; and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations