Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. [REVIEW]Joseph R. Herkert - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):373-385.
    Engineering ethics entails three frames of reference: individual, professional, and social. “Microethics” considers individuals and internal relations of the engineering profession; “macroethics” applies to the collective social responsibility of the profession and to societal decisions about technology. Most research and teaching in engineering ethics, including online resources, has had a “micro” focus. Mechanisms for incorporating macroethical perspectives include: integrating engineering ethics and science, technology and society (STS); closer integration of engineering ethics and computer ethics; and consideration of the influence of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering: Beyond the Individualistic Approach. [REVIEW]Eddie Conlon & Henk Zandvoort - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):217-232.
    There is a widespread approach to the teaching of ethics to engineering students in which the exclusive focus is on engineers as individual agents and the broader context in which they do their work is ignored. Although this approach has frequently been criticised in the literature, it persists on a wide scale, as can be inferred from accounts in the educational literature and from the contents of widely used textbooks in engineering ethics. In this contribution we intend to: (1) Restate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Commentary on “the Greening of engineers: A cross-cultural experience” (A. ansari). [REVIEW]Joseph R. Herkert - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):120-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark