Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Pleasure and truth inrepublic9.David Wolfsdorf - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (1):110-138.
    AtRepublic9, 583b1–587a2, Socrates argues that the pleasure of the philosophical life is the truest pleasure. I will call this the ‘true pleasure argument’. The true pleasure argument is divisible into two parts: 583b1–585a7 and 585a8–587a2. Each part contains a sub-argument, which I will call ‘the misperception argument’ and ‘the true filling argument’ respectively. In the misperception argument Socrates argues that it is characteristic of irrational men to misperceive as pleasant what in fact is a condition of neither having pleasure nor (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Pleasure and truth in republic 9.David Wolfsdorf - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (1):110-138.
    AtRepublic9, 583b1–587a2, Socrates argues that the pleasure of the philosophical life is the truest pleasure. I will call this the ‘true pleasure argument’. The true pleasure argument is divisible into two parts: 583b1–585a7 and 585a8–587a2. Each part contains a sub-argument, which I will call ‘the misperception argument’ and ‘the true filling argument’ respectively. In the misperception argument Socrates argues that it is characteristic of irrational men to misperceive as pleasant what in fact is a condition of neither having pleasure nor (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2005.Stephen P. Weldon - 2005 - Isis 96:1-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Colloquium 4: Plato’s Question of Truth.Francisco Gonzalez - 2008 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 23 (1):83-119.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Knowledge and Truth in the Greatest Difficulty Argument: Parmenides 133b4–134b5.Gail Fine - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (3-4):209-234.
    One of Plato’s central tenets is that we can know forms. In Parmenides 133b4–134b5, Plato presents an argument whose sceptical conclusion is that we can’t know forms. Although he indicates that the argument doesn’t succeed, he also says it’s difficult to explain how it fails. Commentators have suggested a variety of flaws. I argue that the argument can be defended against some, though not all, of the alleged flaws. But I also argue that Plato hints at a crucial distinction that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark