Switch to: References

Citations of:

Historia mathematica, vol. 5-10

[author unknown]
Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 36 (3-4):373-376 (1983)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The mathematical development of set theory from Cantor to Cohen.Akihiro Kanamori - 1996 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):1-71.
    Set theory is an autonomous and sophisticated field of mathematics, enormously successful not only at its continuing development of its historical heritage but also at analyzing mathematical propositions cast in set-theoretic terms and gauging their consistency strength. But set theory is also distinguished by having begun intertwined with pronounced metaphysical attitudes, and these have even been regarded as crucial by some of its great developers. This has encouraged the exaggeration of crises in foundations and of metaphysical doctrines in general. However, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Charles L. Dodgson’s Work on Trigonometry.Francine F. Abeles - 2019 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 7 (1):27-38.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • “Um Nada em relação ao infinito”: O aniquilamento na comparação pascaliana.João Figueiredo Nobre Cortese - 2019 - Cadernos Espinosanos 40 (40):35-64.
    Tanto nos Pensamentos quanto em seus trabalhos matemáticos, Pascal faz referência ao “nada”, assim como a um processo que poderíamos chamar de “aniquilamento”, segundo o qual aquilo que é finito se torna um nada diante do infinito. O “nada” pascaliano, segundo a interpretação aqui defendida, pode ter, em diferentes passagens da obra do autor, uma acepção relativa ou uma acepção absoluta, o que vale também para os termos de “infinito”, “desproporção” e “indivisível” na obra de Pascal. Além do valor de (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Frege on Axioms, Indirect Proof, and Independence Arguments in Geometry: Did Frege Reject Independence Arguments?Jamie Tappenden - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):271-315.
    It is widely believed that some puzzling and provocative remarks that Frege makes in his late writings indicate he rejected independence arguments in geometry, particularly arguments for the independence of the parallels axiom. I show that this is mistaken: Frege distinguished two approaches to independence arguments and his puzzling remarks apply only to one of them. Not only did Frege not reject independence arguments across the board, but also he had an interesting positive proposal about the logical structure of correct (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations