Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Failed Abstraction - The Problem of Uno Kōzō's Reading of Marx's Theory of the Value Form.Elena Louisa Lange - 2014 - Historical Materialism 22 (1):3-33.
    Uno Kōzō (1897–1977) was Japan’s foremost Marxian economist. His critique of Marx’s method in Capital, especially regarding the ‘premature’ introduction of value-form analysis in Volume I, motivated him to rewrite all three volumes of Capital in his book The Principles of Political Economy (1950–2).Notwithstanding Uno’s increasing popularity in international Marx research, I will present a critical paper that looks at a fundamental misunderstanding in Uno’s reading of the value form. In what is one of the most significant discussions of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Transition to Capital in Marx’s Critique of Political Economy.Søren Mau - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (1):68-102.
    The introduction of the concept of capital inCapital– with the words ‘we find’ – has provoked a great deal of discussion about the precise relation between the categories of simple circulation and the concept of capital. In this article, I argue that Marx derives the concept of capital by way of an analysis of the immanent contradictions of money, and that this dialectical derivation can be understood as a conceptual movement in which the concepts of money and capital progressively change (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Introduction to ‘The Change in the Original Plan for Marx’s Capital and Its Causes’.Rick Kuhn - 2013 - Historical Materialism 21 (3):117-137.
    In his essay, Henryk Grossman made a powerful case for the continued relevance of Marxist economics. He argued thatCapitalis a fundamentally coherent whole, structured by Marx’s method of moving systematically from more abstract to more concrete levels of analysis. Despite considerable subsequent debate and research, Grossman’s account remains the outstanding contribution to our understanding of this aspect of Marx’s principal work.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark