Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. To test or not to test: genetic cancer predisposition testing in paediatric patients with cancer.Sapna Mehta & Dennis John Kuo - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e17-e17.
    Genetic cancer predisposition testing in the paediatric population poses unique ethical dilemmas. Using the hypothetical example of a teenager with cancer with a high probability of having an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome, we discuss the ethical considerations that affect the decision-making process. Because legally these decisions are made by parents, genetic testing in paediatrics can remove a child’s autonomy to preserve his or her own ‘open future’. However, knowledge of results confirming a predisposition syndrome can potentially be beneficial in modifying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethics of using artificial intelligence (AI) in veterinary medicine.Simon Coghlan & Thomas Quinn - 2023 - AI and Society:1-12.
    This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of ethical issues raised by artificial intelligence (AI) in veterinary medicine for companion animals. Veterinary medicine is a socially valued service, which, like human medicine, will likely be significantly affected by AI. Veterinary AI raises some unique ethical issues because of the nature of the client–patient–practitioner relationship, society’s relatively minimal valuation and protection of nonhuman animals and differences in opinion about responsibilities to animal patients and human clients. The paper examines how these distinctive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A reflection on research ethics and citizen science.Kathleen M. Oberle, Stacey A. Page, Fintan K. T. Stanley & Aaron A. Goodarzi - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-10.
    Ethics review of research involving humans has become something of an institution in recent years. It is intended to protect participants from harm and, to that end, follows rigorous standards. Giv...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Good Proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies.Simon Coghlan, Tim Miller & Jeannie Paterson - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1581-1606.
    Online exam supervision technologies have recently generated significant controversy and concern. Their use is now booming due to growing demand for online courses and for off-campus assessment options amid COVID-19 lockdowns. Online proctoring technologies purport to effectively oversee students sitting online exams by using artificial intelligence systems supplemented by human invigilators. Such technologies have alarmed some students who see them as a “Big Brother-like” threat to liberty and privacy, and as potentially unfair and discriminatory. However, some universities and educators defend (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dementia, Healthcare Decision Making, and Disability Law.Megan S. Wright - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S4):25-33.
    Persons with dementia often prefer to participate in decisions about their health care, but may be prevented from doing so because healthcare decision-making law facilitates use of advance directives or surrogate decision makers for persons with decisional impairments such as dementia. Federal and state disability law provide alternative decision-making models that do not prevent persons with mild to moderate dementia from making their own healthcare decisions at the time the decision needs to be made. In order to better promote autonomy (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations