Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ʻHow Bourgeois Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?ʼ.Heide Gerstenberger - 2019 - Historical Materialism 27 (3):191-209.
    While the overview concerning debates on bourgeois revolutions is impressive, it cannot elucidate the theoretical concept of bourgeois revolutions. Neil Davidson’s own suggestion centres on the removal of hindrances to the breakthrough of capitalism, especially the pre-capitalist state. This formalistic definition is based on the assumption that revolutions occurred when the superstructure became a hindrance to the further development of productive forces. It deprives the theoretical concept of bourgeois revolutions of any concrete historical content. This paper suggests restricting the use (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the Development of the Critique of Political Economy as a Critical Social Theory of Economic Objectivity.Chris O’Kane - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (1):175-193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Marxist Theory of the State.Graeme Duncan - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 14:129-143.
    Marx did not approach the state in answer to some such broad and abstract philosophical question as: What is the state? Nor did he offer a full sociological or historical or analytic account of state institutions and functions, and there are hence clear and substantial dangers in extrapolating to all or most conditions an account which is, in large part, specific to bourgeois society. Failing a comprehensive and formal treatise on politics and the state, Marx's own discussion consists of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Theory and Necessity: The Stadial Foundations of the Present.David Laibman - 2005 - Science and Society 69 (3):285 - 315.
    Recent events impel us to rethink fundamentals: to bring political economy, historical materialist theory, state theory, and the theory of nations and national consciousness together, and to bear on the core questions: How mature is world capitalism today? What stadial — stage-theoretic — elements must be invoked to explain the present? A rigorous stadial approach to capitalist evolution suggests that, contrary to much popular wisdom, capitalism's conquest of the world is far from complete. This understanding does not mechanically postpone significant (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Everyday Life and the State, Peter Bratsis, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2006.Elmar Flatschart - 2012 - Historical Materialism 20 (3):201-212.
    The present review essay discusses Peter Bratsis’s work Everyday Life and the State. It is argued that Bratsis produces a sound contribution to the on-going debate on state theory, which has its particular strengths in the innovative treatment of the public-private divide and an elaborate critique of fetishistic and ideological relations in the field of the political. In this, Bratsis builds on a broad range of structuralist, poststructuralist and dialectical positions. Deficiencies of his work are likewise to be found in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Editorial Introduction.Guido Starosta - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (4):161-168.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark