Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Beyond the 'french Fries and the frankfurter': An agenda for critical theory.Lorraine Y. Landry - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):99-129.
    Debates between Habermas and the poststructuralists - specifically, Derrida, Foucault and Lyotard - over the nature of critiques of Enlightenment rationality and modernity are investigated in order to argue for an agenda for critical theory beyond the 'French Fries and the Frankfurter'.1 Part I interrogates key elements of Habermas' theory of communicative rationality in his reconstruction of Enlightenment modernity and his critique of the poststructuralists. This orients the discussion toward an evaluation of Habermas' neo-Kantianism, theory of language (discourse ethics), and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The taste of contemporaneity: is the west kitsch?Alberto Castelli & Barbara Sonzogni - 2022 - Journal for Cultural Research 26 (2):166-183.
    As the twenty-first century begins, Benjamin’s aura as the quality of an authentic-art-object might be outdated, but the notion of kitsch remains essential in a post-Warholian world. The following discussion is an attempt to assess Western contemporaneity. By using a few examples, so to dissect problems into their smallest components, I suggest that the current popularity of kitsch inclinations and behaviours in Western societies are not a means to resist cultural and aesthetic elitism, but an implication of widespread bad taste.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Modernity and Biography: Women's Lives in Contemporary India.Veena Das - 1994 - Thesis Eleven 39 (1):52-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Judging justice: The strange responsibility of deconstruction.Stella Gaon - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):97-114.
    This paper demonstrates that when the concept of ethicalpolitical responsibility is taken in its modern sense as a decision or outcome based on the protocols of reason, responsibility is neither simply possible nor simply impossible. Paradoxically, it appeals to a demand that it cannot fulfil; responsibility is thus (im)possible. Moreover, insofar as a deconstructive demonstration of this aporia is itself a response to reason’s own demand, deconstruction cannot be characterized as simply responsible or irresponsible. Rather, deconstruction inscribes itself as the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Schooling and everyday life: Knowledges sacred and profane.Johan Muller & Nick Taylor - 1995 - Social Epistemology 9 (3):257 – 275.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation