Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Derrida and Husserl on Time.Luke Fischer - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (2):345-357.
    In this essay I take issue with Derrida's interpretation of Husserl's phenomenology of internal time-consciousness in Speech and Phenomena. Derrida's critique of Husserl's phenomenology of time also forms the basis for what Derrida regards to be an undermining of phenomenological philosophy itself. After first disagreeing with Derrida's interpretation of Husserl's understanding of time I proceed to object to his “undermining” of phenomenology. I attempt to illustrate that his critique of phenomenology is unconvincing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • No letters: Hobbes and 20th-century philosophy of language.W. P. Grundy - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):486-512.
    The author argues that Thomas Hobbes anticipates a set of questions about meaning and semantic order that come to fuller expression in the 20th century, in the writings of W.V.O. Quine, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Donald Davidson, Jacques Derrida, and Richard Rorty. Despite their different points of departure, these 20th-century writers pose a number of profound questions about the conditions for the stability of meaning, and about the conditions that govern the use of the term “language” itself. Though the more recent debate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does Communicative Competence Need To Be Re-conceptualized?Michelle Forrest - 2009 - Journal of Thought 44 (1/2):101-111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Derrida, Husserl, and the commentators: Introducing a developmental approach.Joshua L. Kates - 2003 - Husserl Studies 19 (2):101-129.
    This article argues that only a developmental approach-one that views Derrida's 1967 work on Husserl, La Voix et la phénomène, in light of Derrida's three earlier encounters with Husserl's work and recognizes significant differences among them-is able to resolve the bitter controversy that has lately surrounded Derrida's Husserl interpretation. After first reviewing the impasse reached in these debates, the need for "a new hermeneutics of deconstruction" is set out, and, then, the reasons why strong development has been rejected internal to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation