Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Encountering the Past: Grand Narratives, Fragmented Histories and LGBTI Rights ‘Progress’.Kay Lalor - 2019 - Law and Critique 30 (1):21-40.
    Past and future coalesce in discussions of LGBTI rights, often embedded in narratives of progress, civilisation, colonisation and emancipation. An understanding of these dynamics can help to illuminate the complex power relations that currently striate international LGBTI rights discourses. This paper analyses how temporality operates in the context of international LGBTI rights through an examination of the World Bank’s withdrawal of a $90 million loan to Uganda after the passage of the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2014. To do this, the paper juxtaposes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Debilitating Times: Compulsory Ablebodiedness and White Privilege in theory and Practice.Kay Inckle - 2015 - Feminist Review 111 (1):42-58.
    In this paper I take up a critical position in regard to the theme of debility around which this collection is framed. I argue that theorisations of ‘debility’ do little to progress theory and policy in regard to disability and share many of the problems inherent to the social model. I also suggest that the theorisation of debility is rooted in and reinforces ablebodied privilege. I begin with a critical analysis of the social model of disability and explore the dualisms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Making Different Differences: Representation and Rights in Sexuality Activism.Kay Lalor - 2015 - Feminist Legal Studies 23 (1):7-25.
    This paper argues that current iterations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex rights are limited by an overreliance on particular representations of sexuality, in which homosexuality is defined negatively through a binary of homosexual/heterosexual. The limits of these representations are explored in order to unpick the possibility of engaging in a form of sexuality politics that is grounded in difference rather than in sameness or opposition. The paper seeks to respond to Braidotti’s call for an “affirmative politics” that is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations