Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Reply To Uttl And Morin’s Commentary Of Hughes And Nicholson ☆.Susan M. Hughes & Julia Heberle - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1138-1139.
    In response to a commentary provided by Uttl and Morin regarding the recent study by Hughes and Nicholson, we evaluate their suggestion to modify our study’s design to reduce ceiling effects. Also, the commentators failed to take into account our data on reaction times, which help substantiate our conclusions regarding self-face and self-voice recognition. This rejoinder encourages readers to consider the relevance of the ecological validity of Hughes and Nicholson’s findings.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The neural correlates of visual self-recognition.Christel Devue & Serge Brédart - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):40-51.
    This paper presents a review of studies that were aimed at determining which brain regions are recruited during visual self-recognition, with a particular focus on self-face recognition. A complex bilateral network, involving frontal, parietal and occipital areas, appears to be associated with self-face recognition, with a particularly high implication of the right hemisphere. Results indicate that it remains difficult to determine which specific cognitive operation is reflected by each recruited brain area, in part due to the variability of used control (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Ceiling effects make Hughes and Nicholson’s data analyses and conclusions inconclusive.Bob Uttl & Alain Morin - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1135-1137.
    Hughes and Nicholson suggest that recognizing oneself is easier from face vs. voice stimuli, that a combined presentation of face and voice actually inhibits self-recognition relative to presentation of face or voice alone, that the left hemisphere is superior in self-recognition to the right hemisphere, and that recognizing self requires more effort than recognizing others. A re-examination of their method, data, and analyses unfortunately shows important ceiling effects that cast doubts on these conclusions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark