Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.Evelyn Pluhar - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):147-171.
    The ethical theory underlying much of our treatment of animals in agriculture and research is the moral agency view. It is assumed that only moral agents, or persons, are worthy of maximal moral significance, and that farm and laboratory animals are not moral agents. However, this view also excludes human non-persons from the moral community. Utilitarianism, which bids us maximize the amount of good in the world, is an alternative ethical theory. Although it has many merits, including impartiality and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Respect for animal autonomy in bioethical analysis: The case of automatic milking systems (AMS). [REVIEW]Kate M. Millar - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):41-50.
    An analysis of the ethical impacts of the use of anAutomatic Milking System (AMS) is employed as a casestudy to illustrate the use of a form of bioethicalanalysis in technology assessment. The approach isbased on the Ethical Matrix, where `impacts' areassessed in terms of (lack of) respect for threeethical principles as applied to interest groups. Inthis case, only impacts on dairy cows are examined,and principally in terms of their behaviouralfreedom.In contrast to traditional milking systems, AMS, inprinciple, allow cows to present (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.Evelyn Pluhar - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3 (2):147-171.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
    Responsibility as a dual to human rights is presented as a moral alternative to extended, complex systems of animal and ecological rights. This simple idea of responsibility is then applied to four levels of agricultural technology: animal (nature) rights, conservation, organization of agriculture, and people versus planet relationships. The stewardship argument is freed from at least some of the complications of animal rights and ecology, but leaves responsibility with humans to do the right thing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (2 other versions)Business failure in the use of animals: Ethical issues and contestations.Kamel Mellahi & Geoffrey Wood - 2005 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 14 (2):151–163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (2 other versions)Business failure in the use of animals: ethical issues and contestations.Kamel Mellahi & Geoffrey Wood - 2005 - Business Ethics 14 (2):151-163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Evaluating Longevity as a Farm Animal Welfare Indicator.Stefan Mann - 2023 - Food Ethics 9 (1):1-13.
    In assessing the welfare of dairy cows and laying hens, longevity has recently been introduced as an indicator. This paper presents recent attempts to transfer the normative power of longevity to non-human animals and evaluates this choice systematically. It first shows that the normative power of longevity can be justified by utilitarianism but not by rights-based approaches. The case of the ban to kill day-old chicks in Germany is then used to show that public opinion leans neither to the utilitarian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark