This contribution explores how Forrester’s work on cases has opened up an arena that might be called ‘the medical case as a travelling genre’. Although usually focused on the course of disease in an individual patient and authored mostly by one medical author, medical case histories have a social dimension: Once published, they often circulate in networks of scholars. Moreover, scholars of the history of literature have shown that numerous medical cases seem to travel easily beyond the context of medical (...) science into the realm of popular literature and journalism. After tracing the idea of cases travelling in Forrester’s Thinking in Cases, I discuss several contributions by authors who, in the wake of interdisciplinary research on cases in the past two decades, have dealt in different ways with this idea. In the third section, I present my own research on a case of self-crucifixion that was widely discussed in 19th-century Europe. I suggest that understanding the case as a ‘traveling genre’ – an expression borrowed from literary genre theory – highlights the role of readers and publication formats as constitutive for cases, and enables us to see more clearly what cases do for scientists and writers who work with them. (shrink)

When radiocarbon dating techniques were applied to archaeological material in the 1950s they were hailed as a revolution. At last archaeologists could construct absolute chronologies anchored in temporal data backed by immutable laws of physics. This would make it possible to mobilize archaeological data across regions and time-periods on a global scale, rendering obsolete the local and relative chronologies on which archaeologists had long relied. As profound as the impact of 14C dating has been, it has had a long and (...) tortuous history now described as proceeding through three revolutions, each of which addresses distinct challenges of capturing, processing and packaging radiogenic data for use in resolving chronological puzzles with which archaeologists has long wrestled. In practice, mobilizing radiogenic data for archaeological use is a hard-won achievement; it involves multiple transformations that, at each step of the way, depend upon a diverse array of technical expertise and background knowledge. I focus on strategies of triangulation and traceability that establish the integrity of these data and their relevance as anchors for evidential reasoning in archaeology. (shrink)

The provocative paper by John Forrester ‘If p, Then What? Thinking in Cases’ opened up the question of case thinking as a separate mode of reasoning in the sciences. Case-based reasoning is certainly endemic across a number of sciences, but it has looked different according to where it has been found. This article investigates this mode of science – namely thinking in cases – by questioning the different interpretations of ‘If p?’ and exploring the different interpretative responses of what follows (...) in ‘Then What?’. The aim is to characterize how ‘reasoning in, within, with, and from cases’ forms a mode of scientific investigation for single cases, for runs of cases, and for comparative cases, drawing on materials from a range of different fields in which case-based reasoning appears. (shrink)

The psychoanalytical case history was in many ways the pivot point of John Forrester’s reflections on case-based reasoning. Yet the Freudian case is not without its own textual forebears. This article closely analyses texts from two earlier case-writing traditions in order to elucidate some of the negotiations by which the case history as a textual form came to articulate the mode of reasoning that we now call ‘thinking in cases’. It reads Eugène Azam’s 1876 observation of Félida X and her (...) ‘double personality’—the case that brought both Azam and Félida to prominence in late 19th-century French science—against a medico-surgical case penned by the Bordeaux physician in the same decade. While the stylistics of Azam’s medical case mirror its epistemic underpinnings in the ‘vertical’ logics of positivist science, the multiple narratives interwoven in Félida’s case grant both Azam and his patient the role of knowledge-making actors in the text. This narrative transformation chimes with the way Azam reasons ‘horizontally’ from particulars to Félida’s singular condition, but sits in tension with his choice to structure the observation along a ‘vertical’ axis. Between the two, we glimpse the emergence of the psychological observation as a mode of writing and thus of thinking in cases. (shrink)

The topic of the presence, legitimacy and epistemic worth of narrative explanations in different kinds of scientific discourse has already enjoyed several revivals within related discussions in contemporary philosophy of science. In fact, we have recently witnessed a more extensive, more unprejudiced and ambitious attention to narrative modes of making science. I think we need a systematic theoretical framework in order to categorize these different functions of narratives and understand their role in scientific explanatory and justificatory practice. My claim is (...) that some distinctions and analytic tools developed within the field of contemporary Argumentation Theory might be of help. (shrink)

Als Vorstellung eines vom Wissen der Medizin abweichenden Behandlungsfalls können Fallberichte darauf Einfluss haben, welche Maßnahmen zukünftig als medizinisch indiziert gelten. Die öffentliche Präsentation der getroffenen Handlungen und Empfehlungen liegt in der Regel ausschließlich in der Hand ärztlicher Autor*innen – Betroffene kommen hingegen kaum zu Wort. Während in der klinischen Patientenversorgung bereits hohes Gewicht auf Patientenperspektiven und -erzählungen gelegt wird, scheinen sich diese Entwicklungen im Fallbericht als Form wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation so nicht widerzuspiegeln. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird im Folgenden aus gattungstheoretischer (...) Perspektive untersucht, welche Rolle Patientenperspektiven und -erzählungen nicht nur – wie in der bisherigen Forschung vor allem untersucht – im Bereich des Klinischen, sondern gerade auch des Kasuistischen und den damit verbundenen Fragen klinischer Indikationsreflexion und -empfehlung zukommen sollten. Dabei wird nicht zuletzt argumentiert, dass Narrationen analog zu Indikationsstellungen gerade ein Moment des Ungesicherten und Singulären betonen, das für die Textsorte des Fallberichts und daraus abgeleiteten Indikationsüberlegungen von spezifischem Wert ist. (shrink)

Als Vorstellung eines vom Wissen der Medizin abweichenden Behandlungsfalls können Fallberichte darauf Einfluss haben, welche Maßnahmen zukünftig als medizinisch indiziert gelten. Die öffentliche Präsentation der getroffenen Handlungen und Empfehlungen liegt in der Regel ausschließlich in der Hand ärztlicher Autor*innen – Betroffene kommen hingegen kaum zu Wort. Während in der klinischen Patientenversorgung bereits hohes Gewicht auf Patientenperspektiven und -erzählungen gelegt wird, scheinen sich diese Entwicklungen im Fallbericht als Form wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation so (noch) nicht widerzuspiegeln. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird im Folgenden aus (...) gattungstheoretischer Perspektive untersucht, welche Rolle Patientenperspektiven und -erzählungen nicht nur – wie in der bisherigen Forschung vor allem untersucht – im Bereich des Klinischen, sondern gerade auch des Kasuistischen und den damit verbundenen Fragen klinischer Indikationsreflexion und -empfehlung zukommen sollten. Dabei wird nicht zuletzt argumentiert, dass (Patienten-)Narrationen analog zu Indikationsstellungen gerade ein Moment des Ungesicherten und Singulären betonen, das für die Textsorte des Fallberichts und daraus abgeleiteten Indikationsüberlegungen von spezifischem Wert ist. (shrink)