Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Care, Compassion, or Cost: Redefining the Basis of Treatment in Ethics and Law.Tom Koch - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):130-139.
    Early announcements of this special journal issue solicited authors interested in contributing articles on the subject of “costs at the end of life.” Those who replied were then informed the title was being changed, on the basis of early subscriber interest, in “rational end-of-life treatment.” Because that seemed a still inadequate reflection of the authorial concerns of responding potential contributors, the editors again changed the title, two months later, to “Making Treatments More Rational and Compassionate for the Chronically Critically Ill.” (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Under the knife and under the lens: ethical issues in broadcasting live surgery.Richard Huxtable - 2013 - Clinical Ethics 8 (1):9-14.
    Live broadcasts of surgical procedures are most common at professional conferences, but they are not uncommon in the wider public arena, with operations having recently been transmitted in realtime on public television in the UK. This phenomenon raises ethical concerns familiar from the professional context, along with some distinct considerations which merit further attention. In this article I aim to examine the issues in terms of patient autonomy, patient welfare and the public interest. Prompted by the interest recently expressed by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient.Richard Huxtable - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):565-569.
    The recent ruling from England on the case of M is one of very few worldwide to consider whether life-sustaining treatment, in the form of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration, should continue to be provided to a patient in a minimally conscious state. Formally concerned with the English law pertaining to precedent autonomy (specifically advance decision-making) and the best interests of the incapacitated patient, the judgment issued in M's case implicitly engages with three different accounts of the value of human (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations