Oikkonen, J. and J. Väänänen, Game-theoretic inductive definability, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 65 265-306. We use game-theoretic ideas to define a generalization of the notion of inductive definability. This approach allows induction along non-well-founded trees. Our definition depends on an underlying partial ordering of the objects. In this ordering every countable ascending sequence is assumed to have a unique supremum which enables us to go over limits. We establish basic properties of this induction and examine examples where it (...) emerges naturally. In the main results we prove an abstract Kleene Theorem and restricted versions of the Stage-Comparison Theorem and the Reduction Theorem. (shrink)

Given an uncountable regular cardinal κ, we study the structural properties of the class of all sets of functions from κ to κ that are definable over the structure 〈H,∈〉 by a Σ1-formula with parameters. It is well known that many important statements about these classes are not decided by the axioms of ZFC together with large cardinal axioms. In this paper, we present other canonical extensions of ZFC that provide a strong structure theory for these classes. These axioms are (...) variations of the Maximality Principle introduced by Stavi and Väänänen and later rediscovered by Hamkins. (shrink)

If T is an unstable theory of cardinality <λ or countable stable theory with OTOP or countable superstable theory with DOP, λω λω1 in the superstable with DOP case) is regular and λ<λ=λ, then we construct for T strongly equivalent nonisomorphic models of cardinality λ. This can be viewed as a strong nonstructure theorem for such theories. We also consider the case when T is unsuperstable and develop further a result of Shelah about the existence of L∞,λ-equivalent nonisomorphic models for (...) such T. In addition, we show that a natural analogue of Scott's isomorphism theorem fails for models of power κ, if κω is regular, assuming κ<κ=κ. (shrink)

Hyttinen and Väänänen study extensively the so-called Scott and Karp trees. Their paper leaves some open interesting questions:1. Are Scott trees closed under infimums?2. Are Karp trees closed under infimums?3. Does every Karp tree contain a subtree of small cardinality which is itself also a Karp tree?The present article addresses these questions. It turns out that there are counterexamples dictating a negative answer to and . The answer to question , however, is independent of the standard ZFC axioms of set (...) theory provided that the existence of a strongly compact cardinal is consistent. (shrink)