Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Logical Cornestones of Judaic Argumentation Theory.Andrew Schumann - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):305-326.
    In this paper, the four Judaic inference rules: qal wa- ḥ omer, gezerah š awah, heqe š, binyan ’av are considered from the logical point of view and the pragmatic limits of applying these rules are symbolic-logically explicated. According to the Talmudic sages, on the one hand, after applying some inference rules we cannot apply other inference rules. These rules are weak. On the other hand, there are rules after which we can apply any other. These rules are strong. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Rereading Durkheim in light of Jewish law: how a traditional rabbinic thought-model shapes his scholarship.Taylor Paige Winfield - 2020 - Theory and Society 49 (4):563-595.
    When studying the work of Émile Durkheim, scholars must consider how his intellectual development in a traditional Jewish environment contributed to and informed his ideas. This article details how Durkheim’s upbringing endowed him with a traditional rabbinic thought-model. The author analyzes five of Durkheim’s major works to argue that the system of classification, language, and style of argument Durkheim used to define concepts in his scholarship mirror streams of rabbinic thought. The article builds off the sociology of knowledge to illuminate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark