Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Insights, Errors and Self‐Misconceptions of the Theory of Principles.Ralf Poscher - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (4):425-454.
    The theory of principles is multifaceted. Its initial expression contained an important argument against positivist theories of adjudication. As a legal theory, it fails in its effort to claim a structural difference between rules and principles. It also fails as a methodological theory that reduces adjudication to subsumption or balancing. It misunderstands itself when it is conceived as a doctrinal theory especially of fundamental rights. Its most promising aspect could be its contribution to a more comprehensive theory of legal argumentation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the Tension between Moral Autonomy and the Rational Justification of Norms.Jan–R. Sieckmann - 2003 - Ratio Juris 16 (1):105-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why non-monotonic logic is inadequate to represent balancing arguments.Jan-R. Sieckmann - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):211-219.
    This paper analyses the logical structure of the balancing of conflicting normative arguments, and asks whether non-monotonic logic is adequate to represent this type of legal or practical reasoning. Norm conflicts are often regarded as a field of application for non-monotonic logics. This paper argues, however, that the balancing of normative arguments consists of an act of judgement, not a logical inference, and that models of deductive as well as of defeasible reasoning do not give an adequate account of its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations