- Borderlands of Life: IVF Embryos and the Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany.Ingrid Metzler & Sheila Jasanoff - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (6):1001-1037.details
|
|
Constitutionalism at the Nexus of Life and Law.Krishanu Saha, Sheila Jasanoff & J. Benjamin Hurlbut - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (6):979-1000.details
|
|
Bioconstitutional Imaginaries and the Comparative Politics of Genetic Self-knowledge.Sheila Jasanoff, Luca Marelli, Ingrid Metzler & J. Benjamin Hurlbut - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (6):1087-1118.details
|
|
Ethical Controversies of Familial Searching: The Views of Stakeholders in the United Kingdom and in Poland.Helena Machado & Rafaela Granja - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (6):1068-1092.details
|
|
Promising waste: biobanking, embryo research, and infrastructures of ethical efficiency.J. Benjamin Hurlbut - 2015 - Monash Bioethics Review 33 (4):301-324.details
|
|
Risk assessment of genetically modified food and neoliberalism: An argument for democratizing the regulatory review protocol of the Food and Drug Administration.Zahra Meghani - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):967–989.details
|
|
Make Way for the Robots! Human- and Machine-Centricity in Constituting a European Public–Private Partnership.Kjetil Rommetveit, Niels van Dijk & Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir - 2020 - Minerva 58 (1):47-69.details
|
|
NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing.Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley & Warren Pearce - 2019 - Agriculture and Human Values 36 (4):779-791.details
|
|
Nation-Building and the Governance of Emerging Technologies: the Case of Nanotechnology in India.Koen Beumer - 2019 - NanoEthics 13 (1):5-19.details
|
|
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.Kathryn Maxson Jones, Rachel A. Ankeny & Robert Cook-Deegan - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (4):693-805.details
|
|
How to do things with metaphors: engineering life as hodgepodge.Matthew Kearnes, Declan Kuch & Angus Johnston - 2018 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1):1-17.details
|
|
Transforming academia: The role of education.Joakim Juhl & Anders Buch - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (8):803-814.details
|
|
Genomics? That is probably GM! The impact a name can have on the interpretation of a technology.Reginald Boersma & Bart Gremmen - 2018 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1):1-15.details
|
|
Islet Xeno/transplatation and the risk of contagion: local responses from Canada and Australia to an emerging global technoscience.Myra Cheng - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-23.details
|
|
Naming is framing: the public understanding of scientific names.Reginald Boersma - 2018 - Dissertation, Wageningen Universitydetails
|
|
The Power of Analogies for Imagining and Governing Emerging Technologies.Claudia Schwarz-Plaschg - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):139-153.details
|
|
Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions.Regula Valérie Burri - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):81-98.details
|
|
Carnation Atoms? A History of Nuclear Energy in Portugal.Tiago Santos Pereira, Paulo F. C. Fonseca & António Carvalho - 2018 - Minerva 56 (4):505-528.details
|
|
Family Resemblances: Human Reproductive Cloning as an Example for Reconsidering the Mutual Relationships between Bioethics and Science Fiction.Solveig L. Hansen - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (2):231-242.details
|
|
How to Address the Policy and Ethical Issues Emerging with New Technology. The Case of Synthetic Biology in a Small Country.Franc Mali - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (1):61-73.details
|
|
How knowledge deficit interventions fail to resolve beginning farmer challenges.Adam Calo - 2018 - Agriculture and Human Values 35 (2):367-381.details
|
|
How biological background assumptions influence scientific risk evaluation of stacked genetically modified plants: an analysis of research hypotheses and argumentations.Fredrik Andersen & Elena Rocca - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-20.details
|
|
Engineers of Life? A Critical Examination of the Concept of Life in the Debate on Synthetic Biology.Johannes Steizinger - 2016 - In Toepfer Georg & Engelhard Margret (eds.), : Ambivalences of Creating Life – Societal and Philosophical Dimensions of Synthetic Biology. Springer. pp. 275−292.details
|
|
A philosophy of science for us today? A response to Fellows and Richardson.Sandra Harding - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (7):1829-1838.details
|
|
Regulating Emerging and Future Technologies in the Present.Michael G. Bennett, Jake Gatof, Diana M. Bowman & Karinne Ludlow - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):151-163.details
|
|
Dissolving Decision Making? Models and Their Roles in Decision-Making Processes and Policy at Large.Ragna Zeiss & Stans van Egmond - 2014 - Science in Context 27 (4):631-657.details
|
|
Introduction.Myles W. Jackson - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (1):1-12.details
|
|
Review of Duncan Wilson, The Making of British Bioethics1. [REVIEW]Silvia Camporesi - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):10-12.details
|
|
Biobanks' "engagements": engendering trust or engineering consent?Alan Petersen - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1):1-13.details
|
|
Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses: a Response to Thorstensen.Matthew Kearnes, Phil Macnaghten & Sarah R. Davies - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (3):241-250.details
|
|
Sharing Genetic Information Online: An Exploration of GINA's 2.0 Frontier.Vassilis Ragoussis, Ida Ngueng Feze & Yann Joly - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):53-55.details
|
|
Cultures and Strategies in the Regulation of Nanotechnology in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the European Union.Monika Kurath, Michael Nentwich, Torsten Fleischer & Iris Eisenberger - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (2):121-140.details
|
|
The ethical and political evaluation of biotechnology strategies.Juha Räikkä - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):273-280.details
|
|
Hidden Entities and Experimental Practice: Renewing the Dialogue Between History and Philosophy of Science.Theodore Arabatzis - 2011 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 263:125-139.details
|
|
On the anthropological foundation of bioethics: a critique of the work of J.-F. Malherbe.Henri Mbulu - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (5):409-431.details
|
|
Nanotechnology: a new regime for the public in science?Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):85-94.details
|
|
National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation.Franc Mali, Toni Pustovrh, Blanka Groboljsek & Christopher Coenen - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):167-184.details
|
|
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?Leonhard Hennen - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.details
|
|
Disgust in Bioethics.Arleen Salles & Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):267-280.details
|
|
Trust as Glue in Nanotechnology Governance Networks.Heidrun Åm - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):115-128.details
|
|
Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies.Trond Grønli Åm - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):15-28.details
|
|
Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology.Sheila Jasanoff - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):621-638.details
|
|
GMOs and Global Justice: Applying Global Justice Theory to the Case of Genetically Modified Crops and Food. [REVIEW]Kristian Høyer Toft - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):223-237.details
|
|
Risk and Responsibility in a Manufactured World.Luigi Pellizzoni - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):463-478.details
|
|
Scientific self-regulation—so good, how can it fail?Patrick L. Taylor - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):395-406.details
|
|
The problems with forbidding science.Gary E. Marchant & Lynda L. Pope - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):375-394.details
|
|
Opening up for participation in agro-biodiversity conservation: The expert-lay interplay in a Brazilian social movement. [REVIEW]Ana Delgado - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):559-577.details
|
|
A big regulatory tool-box for a small technology.Diana M. Bowman & Graeme A. Hodge - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (2):193-207.details
|
|
Towards a hermeneutic of technomedical objects.Kjetil Rommetveit - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):103-120.details
|
|
Social epistemology of scientific inquiry: Beyond historical vs. philosophical case studies.Melinda Fagan - unknowndetails
|
|