Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Moral Stress and Moral Distress: Confronting Challenges in Healthcare Systems under Pressure.Mara Buchbinder, Alyssa Browne, Nancy Berlinger, Tania Jenkins & Liza Buchbinder - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-15.
    Stresses on healthcare systems and moral distress among clinicians are urgent, intertwined bioethical problems in contemporary healthcare. Yet conceptualizations of moral distress in bioethical inquiry often overlook a range of routine threats to professional integrity in healthcare work. Using examples from our research on frontline physicians working during the COVID-19 pandemic, this article clarifies conceptual distinctions between moral distress, moral injury, and moral stress and illustrates how these concepts operate together in healthcare work. Drawing from the philosophy of healthcare, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Beyond technology, drips, and machines: Moral distress in PICU nurses caring for end‐of‐life patients.Michelle Gagnon & Diane Kunyk - 2022 - Nursing Inquiry 29 (2):e12437.
    Moral distress is an experience of profound moral compromise with deeply impactful and potentially long‐term consequences to the individual. Critical care areas are fraught with ethical issues, and end‐of‐life care has been associated with numerous incidences of moral distress among nurses. One such area where the dichotomy of life and death seems to be at its sharpest is in the pediatric intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to understand the moral distress experiences of pediatric intensive care nurses (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • “Erring on the Side of Life” Is Sometimes an Error: Physicians Have the Primary Responsibility to Correct This.Arthur R. Derse - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (2):39-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • We don’t need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further.Diego Real de Asúa, Katarina Lee, Peter Koch, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Trevor Bibler - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (5):314-317.
    Although shared decision-making is a standard in medical care, unilateral decisions through process-based conflict resolution policies have been defended in certain cases. In patients who do not stand to receive proportional clinical benefits, the harms involved in interventions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation seem to run contrary to the principle of non-maleficence, and provision of such interventions may cause clinicians significant moral distress. However, because the application of these policies involves taking choices out of the domain of shared decision-making, they face (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations