Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Future Objectivity Requires Perspective and Forward Combinatorial Meta-Analyses.Barbara Hanfstingl - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    This manuscript contributes to a future definition of objectivity by bringing together recent statements in epistemology and methodology. It outlines how improved objectivity can be achieved by systematically incorporating multiple perspectives, thereby improving the validity of science. The more result-biasing perspectives are known, the more a phenomenon of interest can be disentangled from these perspectives. Approaches that call for the integration of perspective into objectivity at the epistemological level or that systematically incorporate different perspectives at the statistical level already exist (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Attention and Blindness: Objectivity and Contingency in Moral Perception.Rebecca Kukla - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (sup1):319-346.
    Moral perception, as the term is used in moral theory, is the perception of normatively contoured objects and states of affairs, where that perception enables us to engage in practical reason and judgment concerning these particulars. The idea that our capacity for moral perception is a crucial component of our capacity for moral reasoning and agency finds its most explicit origin in Aristotle, for whom virtue begins with the quality of perception. The focus on moral perception within moral theory has (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (1 other version)How can Feminist Theories of Evidence Assist Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making?Maya J. Goldenberg - 2013 - Social Epistemology (TBA):1-28.
    While most of healthcare research and practice fully endorses evidence-based healthcare, a minority view borrows popular themes from philosophy of science like underdetermination and value-ladenness to question the legitimacy of the evidence-based movement’s philosophical underpinnings. While the feminist origins go unacknowledged, those critics adopt a feminist reading of the “gap argument” to challenge the perceived objectivism of evidence-based practice. From there, the critics seem to despair over the “subjective elements” that values introduce to clinical reasoning, demonstrating that they do not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)How can Feminist Theories of Evidence Assist Clinical Reasoning and Decision-making?Maya J. Goldenberg - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (1):3-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Case for A Feminist Philosophy of Religion: Transforming Philosophy's Imagery and Myths.Pamela Sue Anderson - 2001 - Ars Disputandi 1 (1):1-17.
    To introduce my case I would like to explain how it comes about that A Feminist Philosophy of Religion: The Rationality and Myths of Religious Belief is a prolegomenon to a new way of thinking, believing and feeling. To develop this case I will introduce and respond to various criticisms of my prolegomenon. This way of proceeding is consistent with my assumption that a distinctive quality of feminist philosophy is the willingness to reflect upon and respond to dissenting voices. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)The Case for A Feminist Philosophy of Religion: Transforming Philosophy's Imagery and Myths.Pamela Sue Anderson - 2001 - Ars Disputandi 1:1-17.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation