Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Correcting an Interpretation of My View on Legal Punishment and Abortion.Henrik Friberg-Fernros - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (3):273-274.
    Volume 26, Issue 3, September 2020, Page 273-274.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The deprivation argument against abortion.Dean Stretton - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (2):144–180.
    The most plausible pro-life argument claims that abortion is seriously wrong because it deprives the foetus of something valuable. This paper examines two recent versions of this argument. Don Marquis's version takes the valuable thing to be a 'future like ours', a future containing valuable experiences and activities. Jim Stone's version takes the valuable thing to be a future containing conscious goods, which it is the foetus's biological nature to make itself have. I give three grounds for rejecting these arguments. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)Legal punishment, abortion and the substance view.Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2019 - The New Bioethics (3):1-3.
    A response to Henrik Friberg-Fernros' commentary on ‘The Ethics of Killing: Strengthening the Substance View with Time-relative Interests’.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Legal punishment, abortion and the substance view.Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (3):275-277.
    A response to Henrik Friberg-Fernros' commentary on ‘The Ethics of Killing: Strengthening the Substance View with Time-relative Interests’.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark