Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints.Tomislav Bracanovic - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (3):229-236.
    In contemporary debates about the nature of bioethics there is a widespread view that bioethical decision making should involve certain knowledge of and respect for cultural diversity of persons to be affected. The aim of this article is to show that this view is untenable and misleading. It is argued that introducing the idea of respect for cultural diversity into bioethics encounters a series of conceptual and empirical constraints. While acknowledging that cultural diversity is something that decision makers in bioethical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Defining the vital condition for organ donation.Rinaldo Bellomo & Nereo Zamperetti - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:27-.
    The issue of organ donation and of how the donor pool can or should be increased is one with significant practical, ethical and logistic implications. Here we comment on an article advocating a paradigm change in the so-called.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Neonatal euthanasia: Why require parental consent? [REVIEW]Jacob M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.
    The Dutch rules governing neonatal euthanasia, known as the Groningen Protocol, require parental consent for severely disabled infants with poor prognoses to have their lives terminated. This paper questions whether parental consent should be dispositive in such cases, and argues that the potential suffering of the neonate or pediatric patient should be the decisive factor under such unfortunate circumstances.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Futile Treatment—A Review.Lenko Šarić, Ivana Prkić & Marko Jukić - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):329-337.
    The main goal of intensive care medicine is helping patients survive acute threats to their lives, while preserving and restoring life quality. Because of medical advancements, it is now possible to sustain life to an extent that would previously have been difficult to imagine. However, the goals of medicine are not to preserve organ function or physiological activity but to treat and improve the health of a person as a whole. When dealing with medical futilities, physicians and other members of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation