Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Revisiting Gender-Inclusive God-Talk.J. Aaron Simmons & Mason Marshall - 2008 - Philosophy and Theology 20 (1-2):243-263.
    Though academic debate over gender-inclusive God-talk seems to have fizzled, the issue is a pressing one within many Christiandenominations today—both within and outside the Church—and for that reason deserves to be briefly revisited. Accordingly, althoughin this essay we approach the issue as professional philosophers, our focus is on the life of the Church—more specifically, those no doubt sizable segments of the Church for which a personal God and Satan exist and evangelism matters. Running an elimination argument, we contend that if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reply to Isham.William Harper - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):223-228.
    In “On Calling God ‘Mother’” (this journal), I argued that the practice of referring to God exclusively in male terms is morally acceptable. Isham claims that I have argued that “God should be referred to exclusively in male terms.” He claims that the Bible refers to God in female terms. He hints that I may have engaged in “gender devaluation.” He claims that there is a “need for a deity with which women can both relate and identify.” The first of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Calling God ‘Mother’.William Harper - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (2):290-297.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations