Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Are bygones bygones?Robin Cubitt, Maria Ruiz-Martos & Chris Starmer - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (2):185-202.
    This article reports an experiment which tests the principle of separability, i.e. that behaviour in a dynamic choice problem is independent of history and of unreachable eventualities. Although this is a well-known principle of orthodox decision theory and central to conventional economic modelling, it has been questioned on grounds suggested by non-expected utility models of choice under risk and by the psychology of affective influences on risk-taking. Our experimental design, which provides between-subjects tests of separability using three treatments in which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • DFT-D: a cognitive-dynamical model of dynamic decision making.Jared M. Hotaling & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):67-80.
    The study of decision making has traditionally been dominated by axiomatic utility theories. More recently, an alternative approach, which focuses on the micro-mechanisms of the underlying deliberation process, has been shown to account for several "paradoxes" in human choice behavior for which simple utility-based approaches cannot. Decision field theory (DFT) is a cognitive-dynamical model of decision making and preferential choice, built on the fundamental principle that decisions are based on the accumulation of subjective evaluations of choice alternatives until a threshold (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Adequate Moods for non-eu Decision Making in a Sequential Framework.Nathalie Etchart - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):1-28.
    In a dynamic (sequential) framework, departures from the independence axiom (IND) are reputed to induce violations of dynamic consistency (DC), which may in turn have undesirable normative consequences. This result thus questions the normative acceptability of non expected-utility (non-EU) models, which precisely relax IND. This paper pursues a twofold objective. The main one is to discuss the normative conclusion: usual arguments linking violations of DC to departures from IND are shown to be actually based on specific (but usually remaining implicit) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation