Switch to: References

Citations of:

One Very Simple Principle

Utilitas 3 (1):1 (1991)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. J. S. Mill's Liberal Utilitarian Assessment of Capitalism Versus Socialism.Jonathan Riley - 1996 - Utilitas 8 (1):39-71.
    John Stuart Mill argued, in hisPrinciples of Political Economy(1848, 7th edn., 1871), that existing laws and customs of private property ought to be reformed to promote a far more egalitarian form of capitalism than hitherto observed anywhere. He went on to suggest that such an ideal capitalism might evolve spontaneously into a decentralized socialism involving a market system of competing worker co-operatives. That possibility of market socialism emerged only as the working classes gradually developed the intellectual and moral qualities required (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.Ben Saunders - 2016 - Mind 125 (500):1005-1032.
    Mill’s harm principle is commonly supposed to rest on a distinction between self-regarding conduct, which is not liable to interference, and other-regarding conduct, which is. As critics have noted, this distinction is difficult to draw. Furthermore, some of Mill’s own applications of the principle, such as his forbidding of slavery contracts, do not appear to fit with it. This article proposes that the self-regarding/other-regarding distinction is not in fact fundamental to Mill’s harm principle. The sphere of protected liberty includes not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Individuality, Custom and Progress.Jonathan Riley - 1991 - Utilitas 3 (2):217.
    If harm is restricted to mean perceptible damage suffered by an agent against his wishes, so that his mere dislike with no evidence of injury is excluded, then Mill's liberty principle arguably is ‘one very simple principle’ as he claims. But even so, what of John Gray's charge that the liberty principle relies on a ‘radically defective’ notion of individuality or autonomy that is incompatible with every civil society's cultural and moral traditions? If he is correct about this, then Mill's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: a Millian response.Alexander Brown - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.
    The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 represents a significant development in UK law. It extends the offence of incitement to racial hatred set out in the Public Order Act 1986 to make it also an offence to stir up hatred against persons on religious grounds. As the most celebrated liberal thinker of the nineteenth century, J.S. Mill might be expected to offer some lessons about the possible dangers of this sort of legislation. A Millian response to the 2006 Act (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • “Harm” and Mill’s Harm Principle.Piers Norris Turner - 2014 - Ethics 124 (2):299-326.
    This article addresses the long-standing problem of how to understand Mill’s famous harm principle in light of his failure to specify what counts as “harm” in On Liberty. I argue that standard accounts restricting “harm” to only certain negative consequences fail to do justice to the text, and that this fact forces us to rethink Mill’s defense of individual liberty. I then offer a new account of that defense in which “harm” is understood in an expansive sense, despite apparent problems (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Mill, Indecency and the Liberty Principle.Jonathan Wolff - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (1):1-16.
    In this paper I want to do two things. One concerns Mill’s attitude to public indecency. In On Liberty Mill expresses the conventional view that certain actions, if conducted in public, are an affront to good manners, and can properly be prohibited. I want to come to an understanding of Mill’s position so that it allows him to defend this part of conventional morality, but does not disrupt certain of his liberal convictions: principally the conviction that what consenting adults do (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions.P. J. Kelly - 1992 - Utilitas 4 (1):196.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark