Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review.Yun Ting Ong, Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon, Hong Wei Yap, Elijah Gin Lim, Kuang Teck Tay, Ying Pin Toh, Annelissa Chin & Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (1):36-42.
    IntroductionClinical ethics committees (CECs) support and enhance communication and complex decision making, educate healthcare professionals and the public on ethical matters and maintain standards of care. However, a consistent approach to training members of CECs is lacking. A systematic scoping review was conducted to evaluate prevailing CEC training curricula to guide the design of an evidence-based approach.MethodsArksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used to evaluate prevailing accounts of CEC training published in six databases. Braun and Clarke’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Living with end-stage renal disease: Moral responsibilities of patients.Karen Schipper, Elleke Landeweer & Tineke A. Abma - 2018 - Nursing Ethics 25 (8):1017-1029.
    Background: Living with a renal disease often reduces quality of life because of the stress it entails. No attention has been paid to the moral challenges of living with renal disease. Objectives: To explore the moral challenges of living with a renal disease. Research design: A case study based on qualitative research. We used Walker’s ethical framework combined with narrative ethics to analyse how negotiating care responsibilities lead to a new perspective on moral issues. Participants and research context: One case (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation