Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Coercive Theories of Meaning or Why Language Shouldn't Matter (So Much) to Philosophy.Charles R. Pigden - 2010 - Logique Et Analyse 53 (210):151.
    This paper is a critique of coercive theories of meaning, that is, theories (or criteria) of meaning designed to do down ones opponents by representing their views as meaningless or unintelligible. Many philosophers from Hobbes through Berkeley and Hume to the pragmatists, the logical positivists and (above all) Wittgenstein have devised such theories and criteria in order to discredit their opponents. I argue 1) that such theories and criteria are morally obnoxious, a) because they smack of the totalitarian linguistic tactics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Pragmatic engagements: Philipp Frank and James Bryant Conant on science, education, and democracy.George Reisch - 2017 - Studies in East European Thought 69 (3):227-244.
    This essay examines the relationship between Philipp Frank and James Bryant Conant in light of two issues that engaged leading American intellectuals in the mid-twentieth century: the place of metaphysics in higher education and the responsibilities of intellectuals as educators to defend democracy against the rise of totalitarianism. It suggests that Frank’s relationship to pragmatism was nourished by his professional and intellectual relationships to Conant and that each of their contributions to our understanding of science is inseparable from their efforts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Economist, Epistemologist … and Censor? On Otto Neurath’s Index Verborum Prohibitorum.George A. Reisch - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (3):452-480.
    This article is about Otto Neurath’s infamous proposal to combat metaphysics by creating and publishing an index of prohibited words. The logic of this proposal is explicated in the frameworks of Neurath’s philosophy of science and his International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. I reconstruct two arguments within Neurath’s project to defend the proposal against criticisms from Neurath’s colleagues and against the charge that philosophers ought not be censors.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations