Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Should We Impose Quotas? Evaluating the “Disparate Impact” Argument against Legalization of Assisted Suicide.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):6-16.
    Prominent among the arguments against the legalization of assisted suicide is the contention that legalization will have a disproportionately adverse, or “disparate,” impact on various vulnerable groups. There are many versions of this argument, with different advocates of this argument focusing on different vulnerable groups, and some advocates confusedly blending slippery slope and social justice concerns. Also, the weight placed on this argument by its various advocates is not uniform, with some including the argument in a list of multiple, apparently (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Writing the Rules of Death: State Regulation of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Jack Schwartz - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):207-216.
    If the Supreme Court affirms either Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington or Quill v. Vacco, state legislatures will be presented with a new and unwelcome task: regulating physician-assisted suicide. This article focuses on the states task of specific policy making in light of the due process reasoning in Compassion in Dying and the equal protection reasoning in Quill. Policy makers must try to predict whether a particular regulation would in practice achieve its intended objective. They must also try (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Writing the Rules of Death: State Regulation of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Jack Schwartz - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):207-216.
    If the Supreme Court affirms either Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington or Quill v. Vacco, state legislatures will be presented with a new and unwelcome task: regulating physician-assisted suicide. This article focuses on the states task of specific policy making in light of the due process reasoning in Compassion in Dying and the equal protection reasoning in Quill. Policy makers must try to predict whether a particular regulation would in practice achieve its intended objective. They must also try (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The right to die debate: a survey.Rosangela Barcaro - 2001 - Global Bioethics 14 (1): 85-90.
    In the present article the concept of the right to die will be analyzed in English and American literature between 1990 and 1994.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Drawing a Line Between Killing and Letting Die: The Law, and Law Reform, on Medically Assisted Dying.Lawrence O. Gostin - 1993 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 21 (1):94-101.
    Reviews the legal position on the distinction drawn between killing and letting die in medically assisted dying.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Should We Impose Quotas? Evaluating the "Disparate Impact" Argument Against Legalization of Assisted Suicide.Ronald A. Lindsay - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):6-16.
    Prominent among the arguments against the legalization of assisted suicide is the contention that legalization will have a disproportionately adverse, or “disparate,” impact on various vulnerable groups. There are many versions of this argument, with different advocates of this argument focusing on different vulnerable groups, and some advocates confusedly blending slippery slope and social justice concerns. Also, the weight placed on this argument by its various advocates is not uniform, with some including the argument in a list of multiple, apparently (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Stemming the Tide: Assisted Suicide and the Constitution.Carl H. Coleman & Tracy E. Miller - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):389-397.
    On November 8, 1994, Oregon became the first state in the nation to legalize assisted suicide. Passage of Proposition 16 was a milestone in the campaign to make assisted suicide a legal option. The culmination of years of effort, the Oregon vote followed on the heels of failed referenda in California and Washington, and other unsuccessful attempts to enact state laws guaranteeing the right to suicide assistance. Indeed, in 1993, four states passed laws strengthening or clarifying their ban against assisted (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations