Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reductionism in Peirce’s sign classifications and its remedy.James Liszka - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (228):153-172.
    Attempts to explain Peirce’s various classifications of signs have been a preoccupation of many Peirce scholars. Opinions are mixed about the sense, coherence, and fruitfulness of Peirce’s various versions, particularly the latter ones. I argue here that it is not a fruitful enterprise, even if sense could be made of them. Although Peirce makes his motivations for the classification of the sciences fairly explicit, it’s hard to find Peirce’s reasons for sign classification. More importantly, I try to make the case (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Broadening Peirce’s Phaneroscopy: Part One.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2012 - The Pluralist 7 (2):1-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Guess at the Other Riddle: The Peircean Material Categories.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2012 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (4):530-557.
    In “An ‘Entirely Different Series of Categories,’” I argue that aside from Peirce’s formal categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness, Peirceans should acknowledge a second set of categories I call the material categories. I also argue that the material categories are irreducible to the formal categories. However, in that article I offer no account of what the material categories are. Moreover, Peirce himself never provides a clear and explicit account of them. The present essay attempts to provide an account of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations