Switch to: References

Citations of:

Martial Metaphors and Argumentative Virtues and Vices

In Alessandra Tanesini & Michael Lynch (eds.), Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Argumentative Adversariality, Contrastive Reasons, and the Winners-and-Losers Problem.Scott Aikin - forthcoming - Topoi:1-8.
    This essay has two connected theses. First, that given the contrastivity of reasons, a form of dialectical adversariality of argument follows. This dialectical adversariality accounts for a broad variety of both argumentative virtues and vices. Second, in light of this contrastivist view of reasons, the primary objection to argumentative adversarialism, the winners-and-losers problem, can be answered.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - forthcoming - Topoi:1-14.
    Since at least the 1980s, the role of adversariality in argumentation has been extensively discussed within different domains. Prima facie, there seem to be two extreme positions on this issue: argumentation should never be adversarial, as we should always aim for cooperative argumentative engagement; argumentation should be and in fact is always adversarial, given that adversariality is an intrinsic property of argumentation. I here defend the view that specific instances of argumentation are adversarial or cooperative to different degrees. What determines (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark